Players

Maximiliano Carrillo 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	13	13	15	13	3

Career Honors

S11st All-BIG-EAST

S23rd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	6	23	.304	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.51
3	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	11	.545	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.15
5	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	24	.292	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	8.08
6	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	6	30	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.51
7	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	5	16	-.125	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.29
9	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	1	24	.542	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.17
10	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	1	18	.722	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	5.38
11	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	19	4.75	6	35	.371	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	22.5	8.95
13	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	3	33	.424	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.59
15	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	7	32	.281	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	7.33
16	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	14	.357	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.76
18	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	16	.125	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.11
19	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.16
20	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	0	11	.818	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.78
22	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	23	.391	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.01
24	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	23	.348	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.29
26	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	21	.190	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.44
28	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	5	33	.394	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	23.0	10.00
29	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	7	28	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	5.57
30	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	20	.550	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.03
34	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	5	17	.059	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.81
35	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	23	.217	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.99
Total		85	250	2.94	82	485	.346	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	304.5	6.50

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	11	2.75	NA	NA	25	1	.960	14.5	7.51
3	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	6	2.00	NA	NA	19	1	.947	9.0	6.15
5	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	14	4.67	NA	NA	12	1	.917	14.5	8.08
6	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	9	1.80	NA	NA	33	2	.939	18.0	7.51
7	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	NA	NA	19	2	.895	4.0	3.29
9	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	NA	NA	18	0	1.000	15.0	9.17
10	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	NA	NA	27	3	.889	17.5	5.38
11	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	NA	NA	33	1	.970	22.5	8.95
13	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	NA	NA	32	2	.938	18.0	6.59
15	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	11	2.20	NA	NA	29	1	.966	18.0	7.33
16	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	NA	NA	16	0	1.000	9.0	6.76
18	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	8	2.67	NA	NA	12	0	1.000	12.5	6.11
19	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	9	3.00	NA	NA	15	0	1.000	8.5	5.16
20	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	NA	NA	17	5	.706	12.5	5.78
22	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	10	3.33	NA	NA	18	2	.889	12.5	7.01
24	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	NA	NA	25	3	.880	14.5	5.29
26	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	NA	NA	19	1	.947	8.0	5.44
28	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	2	4	6	1	1.50	9	2.25	NA	NA	22	0	1.000	23.0	10.00
29	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	11	2.20	NA	NA	39	6	.846	18.5	5.57
30	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	NA	NA	35	4	.886	14.5	6.03
34	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	NA	NA	33	1	.970	7.5	4.81
35	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	NA	NA	32	2	.938	12.5	4.99
Total		85	5	47	52	2	0.61	161	1.89	0	0.00	530	38	.928	304.5	6.50