Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	1	0	3	0.00	6	.500	20	6.67	60	.333	1.0	2.04
6	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	1	0	2	0.00	5	.600	20	6.67	60	.333	0.0	1.64
10	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	0	0	1	0.00	4	.750	21	7.00	71	.296	1.5	2.78
14	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	1	1	4	0.33	5	.200	22	7.33	55	.400	3.5	3.62
15	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	17	5.67	48	.354	1.5	2.34
29	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	23	7.67	58	.397	0.0	2.36
34	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	5	.400	5	0	2	0.00	13	.846	44	11.00	88	.500	4.5	6.70
Total		22	6	0.27	3	20	.150	11	1	15	0.05	47	.681	167	7.59	440	.380	12.0	3.07

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.04
6	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	1.64
10	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.78
14	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.62
15	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	2.34
29	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	2.36
34	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	1	1.00	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.70
Total		22	1	8	9	2	0.41	17	0.77	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	3.07