Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	10	.900	2	0.67	2	1.000	1.0	4.20
4	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	4.60
11	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	4.20
14	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	2	0.33	8	.750	2	0.67	6	.333	1.0	4.95
15	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	3	0.25	15	.800	2	0.50	8	.250	1.0	6.71
17	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	4.18
22	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	4	0.00	11	.636	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	3.65
26	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	4	0.33	12	.667	3	1.00	5	.600	1.0	6.23
36	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	5	1.67	13	.385	1.0	9.16
39	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	1	0.50	15	.933	2	0.50	4	.500	2.0	4.25
Total		32	.	.	.	.	.	32	7	21	0.22	108	.806	23	0.72	57	.404	7.0	5.21

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	15	2.18	28	3	.893	1.0	4.20
4	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	1.76	21	3	.857	0.0	4.60
11	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.20	20	2	.900	0.0	4.20
14	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	12	2.00	24	4	.833	1.0	4.95
15	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	10	2.13	23	1	.957	1.0	6.71
17	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	1.72	18	4	.778	0.0	4.18
22	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	2.00	16	0	1.000	0.0	3.65
26	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	4	2.38	8	0	1.000	1.0	6.23
36	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	20	6.67	11	2.30	20	1	.950	1.0	9.16
39	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	12	1.82	34	6	.824	2.0	4.25
Total		32	.	.	.	.	.	66	2.06	93	2.02	212	24	.887	7.0	5.21