Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3	1	0.75	20	.950	8	2.00	12	.667	3.0	8.03
3	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.33	10	.800	5	1.67	9	.556	1.0	7.92
7	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	5.43
9	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.25	13	.846	2	0.50	2	1.000	1.0	4.10
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	5.54
12	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	11	.727	0.0	3.68
14	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	8	.750	0.0	3.60
15	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	4	0.00	12	.667	2	0.50	6	.333	0.0	3.20
18	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	5	0.00	14	.643	7	1.75	14	.500	0.0	7.60
19	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.20	12	.917	3	0.60	6	.500	1.0	4.50
21	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	1	0.00	10	.900	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	10.00
29	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	3	0.00	13	.769	7	1.40	13	.538	0.0	4.73
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	1	1	0.33	17	.941	2	0.67	3	.667	1.0	4.01
35	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	3	0.00	13	.769	5	1.25	10	.500	0.0	8.35
37	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	10	.800	3	0.75	9	.333	0.0	3.30
40	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	0.0	2.35
45	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	4	0.80	6	.667	0.0	5.60
Total		66	.	.	.	.	.	73	7	30	0.11	182	.835	69	1.05	124	.556	7.0	5.41

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	4.00	12	1.96	27	3	.889	3.0	8.03
3	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	12	2.11	27	2	.926	1.0	7.92
7	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	9	2.00	26	1	.962	0.0	5.43
9	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	11	1.86	28	3	.893	1.0	4.10
11	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	6	1.88	16	3	.813	0.0	5.54
12	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	14	2.10	30	3	.900	0.0	3.68
14	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	22	2.18	40	3	.925	0.0	3.60
15	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	14	2.16	25	2	.920	0.0	3.20
18	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	10	2.50	16	0	1.000	0.0	7.60
19	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	19	2.25	36	2	.944	1.0	4.50
21	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	16	5.33	10	2.60	15	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
29	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	17	2.06	36	3	.917	0.0	4.73
32	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	14	2.27	26	2	.923	1.0	4.01
35	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	23	2.61	31	0	1.000	0.0	8.35
37	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	13	2.08	26	3	.885	0.0	3.30
40	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	2.03	29	0	1.000	0.0	2.35
45	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	12	2.32	28	0	1.000	0.0	5.60
Total		66	.	.	.	.	.	133	2.02	229	2.16	462	30	.935	7.0	5.41