Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	7	24	.083	6	0	1	0.00	16	.938	0	0.00	1	.000	10.0	4.27
3	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	12	25	-.160	7	0	3	0.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	8.0	7.47
7	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	16	.250	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.54
8	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	1	16	.563	5	2	3	0.40	18	.833	.	.	.	.	14.0	4.68
12	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	11	.727	1	1	2	0.25	10	.800	1	0.25	1	1.000	10.5	4.30
14	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	21	.381	4	0	1	0.00	10	.900	0	0.00	2	.000	13.5	7.79
15	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	16	3.20	6	32	.313	3	2	2	0.40	14	.857	.	.	.	.	19.5	7.02
17	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	0	14	.857	0	0	0	0.00	5	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	12.5	7.31
18	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	8	20	-.150	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.5	3.69
21	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	16	.563	6	2	1	0.67	12	.917	1	0.33	2	.500	14.5	8.18
26	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	0	12	.583	2	0	2	0.00	12	.833	1	0.33	1	1.000	7.5	6.07
30	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	18	.278	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	7.5	4.77
35	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	12	.667	6	3	2	1.00	12	.833	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	8.16
39	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	13	.308	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.71
40	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	15	.200	6	2	0	0.50	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.05
45	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	4	20	.300	4	2	3	0.50	14	.786	0	0.00	1	.000	13.5	5.41
Total		58	145	2.50	57	285	.309	58	14	27	0.24	192	.859	4	0.07	12	.333	181.0	5.78

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	7	1.40	15	2.13	31	2	.935	10.0	4.27
3	Santa Clara L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	15	2.74	19	0	1.000	8.0	7.47
7	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	4	1.00	8	2.19	16	1	.938	9.5	4.54
8	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	3	0.60	25	2.30	46	2	.957	14.0	4.68
12	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	17	2.27	33	2	.939	10.5	4.30
14	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	17	2.30	27	2	.926	13.5	7.79
15	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	15	2.55	20	0	1.000	19.5	7.02
17	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	5	2.50	8	0	1.000	12.5	7.31
18	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	10	2.38	16	0	1.000	5.5	3.69
21	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	1	3	4	0	1.33	6	2.00	5	2.33	9	0	1.000	14.5	8.18
26	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	9	2.73	11	0	1.000	7.5	6.07
30	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	19	2.28	36	3	.917	7.5	4.77
35	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	9	2.54	13	1	.923	13.5	8.16
39	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	4	2.17	12	0	1.000	7.0	3.71
40	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	1	9	10	1	2.50	4	1.00	8	2.27	15	0	1.000	14.5	5.05
45	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	1	0.25	8	2.19	16	1	.938	13.5	5.41
Total		58	3	38	41	4	0.71	58	1.00	189	2.34	328	14	.957	181.0	5.78