Players

John Molloy 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	17	16	16	16	9

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	11	.455	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.02
3	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	6	19	-.211	0	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.33
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	16	.313	14	4	3	1.00	21	.857	1	0.25	2	.500	14.5	6.36
6	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	19	.579	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.10
9	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	13	.615	8	1	1	0.33	14	.929	0	0.00	1	.000	9.5	6.54
11	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	12	.500	4	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.33
12	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	15	.733	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.25	1	1.000	12.0	4.48
15	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	9	.444	12	1	3	0.33	19	.842	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.54
16	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	22	.455	4	0	3	0.00	17	.824	1	0.25	1	1.000	13.5	6.68
17	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	18	.389	7	3	2	0.60	19	.895	1	0.20	1	1.000	13.5	4.05
18	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	11	.273	8	3	0	1.00	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.23
21	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	18	.444	1	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.76
25	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	23	4.60	5	32	.563	4	0	1	0.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	25.0	7.94
26	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	12	.333	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.61
29	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	2	27	.407	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	1	0.20	2	.500	14.5	5.23
34	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	13	-.077	4	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.29
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	13	.538	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.65
40	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	11	.364	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.17
Total		65	162	2.49	45	291	.402	81	16	32	0.25	223	.857	5	0.08	8	.625	201.5	5.52

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	12	2.44	18	2	.889	7.5	5.02
3	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	9	1.87	30	1	.967	3.5	2.33
5	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	15	2.19	31	1	.968	14.5	6.36
6	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	8	2.00	9	1.92	25	2	.920	14.5	6.10
9	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	9	2.21	19	1	.947	9.5	6.54
11	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	5	2.10	10	1	.900	9.5	5.33
12	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	12	1.96	26	5	.808	12.0	4.48
15	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	10	3.33	9	2.41	17	1	.941	8.5	6.54
16	Merritt Island L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	8	2.00	13	2.14	29	2	.931	13.5	6.68
17	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	21	2.10	41	7	.829	13.5	4.05
18	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	10	2.56	16	0	1.000	10.5	6.23
21	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	2	0.67	13	1.97	29	3	.897	11.5	5.76
25	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	22	2.23	40	2	.950	25.0	7.94
26	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	12	2.30	23	2	.913	8.0	5.61
29	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	7	1.40	18	2.12	34	4	.882	14.5	5.23
34	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	12	2.04	28	3	.893	6.5	3.29
39	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	2	1.33	2	0.67	12	2.39	18	2	.889	10.0	6.65
40	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	2	0.67	13	2.35	23	0	1.000	9.0	5.17
Total		65	0	47	47	5	0.72	81	1.25	226	2.16	457	39	.915	201.5	5.52