Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	24	8.00	59	.407	2.5	4.54
6	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	7	.000	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	32	10.67	71	.451	0.5	5.32
9	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	4	7	-.571	9	1	2	0.25	19	.895	51	12.75	107	.477	2.5	8.78
12	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	7	1	3	0.25	19	.842	35	8.75	79	.443	4.0	5.60
15	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	5	.200	11	2	1	0.50	23	.957	55	13.75	88	.625	3.0	8.88
19	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	6	2	2	0.67	14	.857	28	9.33	67	.418	3.0	5.69
25	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	3	.000	2	0	1	0.00	13	.923	41	10.25	80	.513	1.5	4.80
26	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	3	.000	8	0	2	0.00	19	.895	48	12.00	76	.632	0.0	6.34
32	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	28	9.33	60	.467	1.0	4.60
Total		32	4	0.13	6	39	-.051	53	6	15	0.19	141	.894	342	10.69	687	.498	18.0	6.06

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.54
6	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	5.32
9	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.78
12	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	5.60
15	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.88
19	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.69
25	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.80
26	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	6.34
32	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.60
Total		32	2	12	14	1	0.44	41	1.28	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	6.06