Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	4	1	2	0.33	13	.846	29	9.67	72	.403	1.0	4.20
6	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	27	9.00	62	.435	1.0	3.64
9	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	10	1	5	0.25	21	.762	43	10.75	90	.478	2.0	6.53
12	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	8	.000	4	2	1	0.67	13	.923	27	9.00	54	.500	3.0	3.64
15	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	6	.000	7	2	1	0.50	18	.944	57	14.25	98	.582	4.0	9.21
17	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	3	0.60	2	8	.125	10	3	4	0.60	23	.826	45	9.00	105	.429	8.5	6.32
30	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	6	1	2	0.33	14	.857	37	12.33	71	.521	3.0	7.50
Total		25	7	0.28	6	34	.029	45	11	16	0.44	113	.858	265	10.60	552	.480	22.5	5.86

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.20
6	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	3.64
9	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	12	3.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	6.53
12	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.64
15	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.21
17	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	10	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.32
30	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	7.50
Total		25	0	9	9	2	0.36	33	1.32	.	.	.	.	.	22.5	5.86