Players

Jared Bush 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	16	11	17	17

Season 11 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
1,035 9th	35 313th	43 11th	93 64th	53 111th

Career Honors

S101st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

S112nd All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	9	2	1	0.67	17	.941	33	11.00	66	.500	2.5	6.23
6	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	4	.000	7	1	0	0.33	15	1.000	42	14.00	62	.677	4.0	9.90
8	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	2	7	.000	12	4	3	0.80	22	.864	53	10.60	93	.570	7.5	6.76
9	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	2	0.00	13	.846	33	11.00	52	.635	0.0	5.62
11	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	5	.600	5	2	1	0.50	16	.938	50	12.50	70	.714	6.5	8.56
12	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	14	4	1	1.33	20	.950	38	12.67	49	.776	7.0	10.00
14	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	9	.333	11	2	2	0.50	21	.905	34	8.50	63	.540	8.5	5.92
16	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	8	.500	8	1	3	0.25	21	.857	57	14.25	83	.687	5.5	9.28
17	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	5	2	2	0.67	14	.857	32	10.67	59	.542	4.0	6.14
20	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	2	-.500	4	1	2	0.33	13	.846	37	12.33	55	.673	1.5	6.82
23	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	7	2	1	0.67	13	.923	40	13.33	53	.755	4.5	8.92
24	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	0	6	.667	6	1	2	0.20	19	.895	52	10.40	88	.591	7.5	6.57
27	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	3	.000	15	4	4	0.80	28	.857	70	14.00	101	.693	8.0	9.74
28	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	4	.000	3	1	1	0.20	18	.944	65	13.00	93	.699	4.0	7.78
30	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	2	10	.000	1	1	3	0.25	11	.727	49	12.25	91	.538	6.5	7.51
32	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	0	5	.600	6	1	3	0.20	21	.857	64	12.80	98	.653	4.5	8.18
34	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	9	3	3	1.00	17	.824	39	13.00	55	.709	7.5	9.76
35	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	9	3	0	1.00	18	1.000	46	15.33	61	.754	3.0	8.77
39	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	2	5	-.400	8	2	3	0.50	20	.850	60	15.00	83	.723	2.5	8.78
40	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	36	12.00	60	.600	5.0	7.63
44	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	2	.000	9	2	0	0.50	21	1.000	53	13.25	82	.646	2.0	8.10
45	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	9	4	2	1.00	22	.909	52	13.00	81	.642	7.0	8.90
Total		83	35	0.42	13	94	.234	165	43	40	0.52	391	.898	1035	12.47	1598	.648	109.0	7.99

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.23
6	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.90
8	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.76
9	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	5.62
11	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	8.56
12	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	10.00
14	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.92
16	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	9.28
17	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.14
20	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	6.82
23	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.92
24	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	1	0.80	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.57
27	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	2	2	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	9.74
28	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.78
30	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	0	1.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	7.51
32	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.18
34	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	0	7	7	1	2.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	9.76
35	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.77
39	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.78
40	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.63
44	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.10
45	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	8.90
Total		83	9	44	53	4	0.64	93	1.12	.	.	.	.	.	109.0	7.99