Players

Liam Olson 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	16	16	7	-

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
200 106th	.400 133rd	25 70th	25 319th	97 2nd

Career Honors

S102nd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

S112nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	6	.000	8	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.59
3	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	4	20	.200	8	1	3	0.20	17	.824	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.14
4	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	15	.133	3	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.63
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	20	.400	8	1	1	0.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.14
6	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	11	.364	6	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.53
7	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	12	.250	4	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.85
8	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	1	19	.684	8	1	6	0.20	20	.700	.	.	.	.	20.0	9.62
10	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	4	32	.375	8	2	4	0.40	20	.800	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.97
11	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	0	12	.583	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.97
13	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	14	.500	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.46
15	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	1	10	.700	6	2	2	0.50	14	.857	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.74
18	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	9	.333	8	3	1	1.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.47
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	8	.625	3	2	1	0.67	9	.889	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.92
22	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	5	20	.150	5	1	1	0.25	15	.933	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.75
23	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	20	.350	3	1	2	0.20	12	.833	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.24
26	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	15	.400	6	2	2	0.50	14	.857	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.43
27	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	12	.333	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.28
29	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	1	18	.667	6	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.32
32	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	5	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.52
34	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	17	.412	4	1	2	0.20	15	.867	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.99
36	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	19	.368	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.54
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	6	.000	9	3	0	1.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.67
41	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	11	.545	5	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.96
44	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	11	.727	5	2	1	0.67	11	.909	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.92
46	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	2	11	.273	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.53
Total		98	200	2.04	58	355	.400	126	25	43	0.26	323	.867	.	.	.	.	278.5	6.61

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	4.59
3	Schenectady L (2–3 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.14
4	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	1	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.63
5	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.14
6	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.53
7	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.85
8	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	1	8	9	0	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	20.0	9.62
10	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.97
11	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.97
13	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.46
15	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.74
18	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.47
19	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.92
22	Alton L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.75
23	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.24
26	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	10	10	1	2.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.43
27	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.28
29	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.32
32	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.52
34	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.99
36	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	7.54
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.67
41	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.96
44	Portland W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.92
46	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.53
Total		98	10	87	97	7	0.99	25	0.26	.	.	.	.	.	278.5	6.61