Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	11	.727	6	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.69
2	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	7	.143	1	1	2	0.33	7	.714	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.80
3	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	6	22	.091	5	1	1	0.20	15	.933	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.80
4	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	22	.091	2	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	1	0.25	1	1.000	8.5	3.52
5	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	21	.333	10	3	2	0.75	19	.895	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.0	6.67
10	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	3	12	.250	4	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.72
11	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	1	16	.688	1	0	3	0.00	10	.700	0	0.00	1	.000	12.0	5.55
13	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	5	29	.379	13	2	4	0.50	23	.826	1	0.25	1	1.000	19.5	8.01
15	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	17	.529	5	1	2	0.33	12	.833	.	.	.	.	13.0	8.17
17	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	20	.250	11	0	3	0.00	22	.864	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.68
18	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	12	.000	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	1	0.33	2	.500	7.0	4.43
25	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	15	.400	6	2	2	0.67	13	.846	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.59
26	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	6	24	.208	8	0	4	0.00	21	.810	.	.	.	.	12.5	4.81
29	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	0	18	.556	9	0	1	0.00	20	.950	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.06
33	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	7	35	.286	4	2	3	0.40	16	.813	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.09
35	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	14	.286	2	1	3	0.33	10	.700	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.51
40	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	22	4.40	3	34	.559	6	1	6	0.20	18	.667	0	0.00	1	.000	23.0	7.48
44	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	19	.316	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	1	0.33	2	.500	11.0	5.67
45	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	2	16	.500	8	2	2	0.67	16	.875	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.32
Total		71	191	2.69	64	364	.349	106	18	45	0.25	274	.836	5	0.07	9	.556	228.0	5.82

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	2	0.67	5	1.67	11	2.50	16	1	.938	10.0	7.69
2	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	13	1.97	29	4	.862	5.0	2.80
3	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	8	1.60	11	2.39	18	0	1.000	11.0	4.80
4	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	12	2.13	24	2	.917	8.5	3.52
5	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	9	2.25	9	2.29	17	1	.941	14.0	6.67
10	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	10	1.70	27	8	.704	7.0	2.72
11	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	1.88	26	3	.885	12.0	5.55
13	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	5	1.25	10	2.05	19	2	.895	19.5	8.01
15	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	13	2.50	20	1	.950	13.0	8.17
17	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	7	1.40	8	2.05	21	1	.952	11.0	4.68
18	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	9	3.00	6	2.00	11	1	.909	7.0	4.43
25	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	13	2.55	20	0	1.000	11.5	7.59
26	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	20	2.14	42	2	.952	12.5	4.81
29	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	17	2.39	28	1	.964	10.5	6.06
33	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	21	2.44	36	0	1.000	20.5	7.09
35	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	9	3.00	7	2.26	19	0	1.000	7.0	4.51
40	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	25	2.33	43	1	.977	23.0	7.48
44	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	13	2.13	24	3	.875	11.0	5.67
45	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	4	1.33	10	2.40	15	1	.933	14.0	8.32
Total		71	1	36	37	7	0.52	95	1.34	239	2.21	455	32	.930	228.0	5.82