Players

Kyle Skinner 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	16	15	15	13	8

Season 10 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
299 30th	.444 98th	17 139th	84 103rd	45 163rd

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	22	5.50	6	35	.457	4	1	2	0.25	12	.833	2	0.50	2	1.000	25.0	7.35
2	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	1	16	.750	7	2	1	0.67	10	.900	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.10
4	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	21	.429	5	1	2	0.33	10	.800	0	0.00	1	.000	15.0	8.55
5	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	18	.333	6	2	2	0.50	14	.857	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.33
7	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	11	.364	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.63
8	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	6	28	.286	2	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	16.5	6.03
10	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	5	26	.462	5	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	18.5	5.85
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	21	.190	3	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.84
15	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	18	6.00	6	26	.462	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	19.0	8.15
17	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	2	30	.567	4	1	1	0.20	13	.923	2	0.40	3	.667	21.0	7.20
18	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	21	.524	12	1	1	0.25	19	.947	.	.	.	.	17.0	8.39
22	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	14	4.67	3	21	.524	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.39
25	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	18	.500	4	2	1	0.67	10	.900	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.88
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	18	4.50	4	28	.500	3	2	1	0.50	12	.917	.	.	.	.	21.0	8.22
29	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	23	.348	9	2	1	0.50	16	.938	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.10
34	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	4	22	.455	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	1	0.25	1	1.000	14.0	6.94
36	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	14	2.80	3	24	.458	4	0	5	0.00	14	.643	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.15
39	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	18	.444	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	12.5	7.70
41	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	23	4.60	2	35	.600	5	0	0	0.00	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	25.0	7.94
44	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	17	-.059	3	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.66
46	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	21	5.25	6	30	.500	3	1	1	0.25	11	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	23.0	7.73
Total		80	299	3.74	82	489	.444	91	17	28	0.21	238	.882	5	0.06	9	.556	339.5	7.01

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	11	1.89	28	3	.893	25.0	7.35
2	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	7	2.33	5	1.86	14	1	.929	17.0	8.10
4	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	8	2.35	17	0	1.000	15.0	8.55
5	Santa Clara L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	9	2.25	16	2.08	36	3	.917	14.0	6.33
7	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	12	2.26	19	2	.895	7.5	4.63
8	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	5	1.00	21	2.22	41	4	.902	16.5	6.03
10	Albuquerque L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	12	2.04	27	3	.889	18.5	5.85
11	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	19	2.41	29	1	.966	8.5	5.84
15	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	10	2.57	14	0	1.000	19.0	8.15
17	Columbia L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	19	2.28	36	1	.972	21.0	7.20
18	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	15	2.42	26	0	1.000	17.0	8.39
22	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	4	1.33	17	2.32	28	3	.893	15.0	8.39
25	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	14	2.32	22	2	.909	13.0	6.88
26	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	17	2.29	31	2	.935	21.0	8.22
29	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	17	2.35	31	1	.968	15.5	7.10
34	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	24	2.49	37	2	.946	14.0	6.94
36	Kentucky W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	19	2.32	37	1	.973	15.5	6.15
39	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	13	2.27	22	1	.955	12.5	7.70
41	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	4	0.80	14	2.22	27	2	.926	25.0	7.94
44	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	9	2.13	24	2	.917	6.0	3.66
46	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	13	2.13	31	2	.935	23.0	7.73
Total		80	2	43	45	3	0.56	84	1.05	305	2.25	577	36	.938	339.5	7.01