Players

Kevin Hicks 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	15	15	7	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	1	15	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.19
2	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	4	18	.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.78
6	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	2	8	.125	4	1	3	0.25	12	.750	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.10
8	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	13	.385	5	0	4	0.00	14	.714	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.84
9	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	8	.000	3	2	1	0.67	9	.889	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.17
11	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	9	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	7	-.143	1	1	1	0.33	7	.857	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.18
14	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	15	.333	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.72
15	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	5	13	.077	11	2	5	0.40	21	.762	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.71
18	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	11	.455	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.56
19	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	5	1.00	3	9	.222	7	3	2	0.60	19	.895	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.40
21	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	4	20	.350	7	2	0	0.40	18	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.57
23	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	2	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.85
30	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	8	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
33	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	10	.700	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.73
35	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	7	.714	7	1	1	0.33	17	.941	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.64
Total		59	91	1.54	37	180	.300	52	14	21	0.24	148	.858	.	.	.	.	139.0	5.70

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	1	6	7	1	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.19
2	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.78
6	Tucson L (1–3 sets)	4	1	5	6	0	1.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	6.10
8	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.84
9	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.17
11	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	1.35
12	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	4.18
14	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.72
15	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	9	9	0	1.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.71
18	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.56
19	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.40
21	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	1	7	8	0	1.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.57
23	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.85
30	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.40
33	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	8.73
35	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.64
Total		59	4	60	64	6	1.08	13	0.22	.	.	.	.	.	139.0	5.70