Players

Keanu Duffy 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	15	-	-	15	14

Season 9 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
155 17th	2.11 129th	.905 134th	95 75th	0 443rd

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	8	.875	0.0	2.80
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	11	.455	0.0	7.53
4	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	4.48
6	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	10	.700	0.0	5.28
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	3	.667	0.0	4.18
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0.0	3.70
11	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	12	.500	0.0	4.08
12	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	9	.667	0.0	3.18
14	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	11	.636	0.0	4.15
16	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	7	.571	0.0	2.65
18	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	6	.333	0.0	4.75
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	2.45
21	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	7	.286	0.0	3.40
22	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	9	.333	0.0	2.55
25	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	8	.500	0.0	4.05
26	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	.375	0.0	2.70
29	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	8.10
31	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	6.53
33	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	3	.667	0.0	6.10
36	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	2.90
38	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	7	.714	0.0	4.10
39	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	9	.667	0.0	4.10
41	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	12	.667	0.0	4.66
44	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	6.16
46	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	3	.333	0.0	5.15
Total		95	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	95	1.00	170	.559	0.0	4.39

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	12	2.03	30	3	.900	0.0	2.80
3	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	12	2.53	19	0	1.000	0.0	7.53
4	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	4	2.00	12	1	.917	0.0	4.48
6	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	9	1.83	24	4	.833	0.0	5.28
7	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	11	2.36	22	0	1.000	0.0	4.18
9	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	15	2.31	26	2	.923	0.0	3.70
11	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	13	2.12	33	2	.939	0.0	4.08
12	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	17	2.06	33	4	.879	0.0	3.18
14	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	17	2.15	34	3	.912	0.0	4.15
16	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	14	2.00	29	4	.862	0.0	2.65
18	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	14	2.10	30	0	1.000	0.0	4.75
19	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.05	19	2	.895	0.0	2.45
21	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	12	1.76	33	6	.818	0.0	3.40
22	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	18	1.98	46	5	.891	0.0	2.55
25	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	15	2.16	32	3	.906	0.0	4.05
26	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	2.00	22	5	.773	0.0	2.70
29	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	8	2.31	13	1	.923	0.0	8.10
31	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	9	2.10	21	2	.905	0.0	6.53
33	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	19	2.24	37	2	.946	0.0	6.10
36	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	1.83	24	4	.833	0.0	2.90
38	Starkville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	8	2.08	24	1	.958	0.0	4.10
39	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	24	2.29	42	4	.905	0.0	4.10
41	Albuquerque W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	18	2.15	34	4	.882	0.0	4.66
44	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	8	2.14	21	0	1.000	0.0	6.16
46	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	9	2.27	15	2	.867	0.0	5.15
Total		95	.	.	.	.	.	155	1.63	315	2.11	675	64	.905	0.0	4.39