Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	5	.000	3	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.75
9	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	14	.286	5	0	1	0.00	13	.923	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.28
10	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	4	0.80	1	11	.273	5	1	2	0.20	15	.867	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.17
15	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	17	.235	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.91
17	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	7	.286	3	2	3	0.50	11	.727	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.21
18	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	3	.667	9	0	3	0.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.69
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	2	3	-.333	1	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.62
25	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	5	15	.067	7	0	5	0.00	17	.706	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.19
26	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.84
31	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	8	.000	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.36
36	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	17	.412	0	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.28
Total		42	46	1.10	20	109	.239	40	4	20	0.10	124	.839	.	.	.	.	64.5	5.21

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.75
9	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.28
10	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	0	1.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.17
15	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	10	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.91
17	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.21
18	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	4.69
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.62
25	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.19
26	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.84
31	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	6.36
36	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.28
Total		42	0	29	29	1	0.69	54	1.29	.	.	.	.	.	64.5	5.21