Players

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 07:03:06 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Colby Spear 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	17	16	14	15	7

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
120 185th	.135 312th	8 250th	31 301st	23 297th

Career Honors

S111st All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	7	35	.029	3	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.31
3	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	9	28	-.071	5	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.02
4	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	17	.235	5	2	1	0.67	11	.909	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.01
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	7	28	-.036	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.88
8	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	2	11	.000	3	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.39
9	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	12	33	-.091	4	0	3	0.00	10	.700	0	0.00	1	.000	9.5	6.65
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	16	5.33	3	24	.542	2	0	4	0.00	9	.556	1	0.33	2	.500	16.0	7.54
18	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	6	26	.154	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.62
21	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	15	5.00	7	27	.296	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.16
25	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	3	23	.435	2	1	1	0.25	12	.917	0	0.00	1	.000	16.0	7.52
32	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	7	20	.000	1	1	1	0.33	8	.875	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.61
34	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	5	17	.176	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	8.0	5.20
45	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	10	3.33	5	22	.227	4	3	0	1.00	12	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	14.0	5.50
Total		41	120	2.93	78	311	.135	35	8	23	0.20	127	.819	2	0.05	6	.333	140.0	5.72

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	12	2.11	27	2	.926	9.5	5.31
3	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	5	1.71	17	1	.941	8.0	4.02
4	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	1.89	18	1	.944	11.0	5.01
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	13	2.35	20	1	.950	7.0	3.88
8	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	11	2.23	22	0	1.000	3.5	4.39
9	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	8	2.24	17	1	.941	9.5	6.65
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	10	2.35	20	0	1.000	16.0	7.54
18	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	15	2.70	20	0	1.000	12.0	6.62
21	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	6	2.21	14	0	1.000	16.0	8.16
25	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	9	2.62	13	0	1.000	16.0	7.52
32	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	6	2.07	14	1	.929	9.5	4.61
34	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	2.33	15	1	.933	8.0	5.20
45	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	6	1.86	14	3	.786	14.0	5.50
Total		41	1	22	23	1	0.56	31	0.76	113	2.21	231	11	.952	140.0	5.72