Players

Career Honors

S92nd All-PAC-8

S113rd All-TMVL2nd All-PAC-8

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	3	22	.500	14	1	3	0.25	23	.870	.	.	.	.	18.5	10.00
2	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	8	31	.129	9	2	2	0.67	14	.857	.	.	.	.	16.0	10.00
3	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	0	11	.455	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.48
10	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	0	19	.684	1	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	15.5	9.22
12	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	5	29	.379	7	0	0	0.00	17	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.50
13	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	14	3.50	2	20	.600	10	2	3	0.50	19	.842	.	.	.	.	18.0	9.39
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	21	4.20	2	32	.594	8	2	2	0.40	20	.900	.	.	.	.	24.5	7.71
19	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	4	.250	8	1	1	0.33	14	.929	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.35
20	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	0	14	.714	1	1	1	0.25	10	.900	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.44
22	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	18	.611	4	2	1	0.50	12	.917	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.30
23	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	4	24	.542	11	1	0	0.20	23	1.000	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.78
27	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	13	.538	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.25
30	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	20	4.00	2	25	.720	1	0	5	0.00	11	.545	.	.	.	.	21.5	6.50
32	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	19	3.80	2	25	.680	6	2	1	0.40	16	.938	.	.	.	.	22.5	6.97
35	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	21	.476	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.72
37	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	10	25	.080	2	1	1	0.25	10	.900	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.14
39	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	18	.556	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.74
40	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	14	3.50	11	33	.091	3	0	5	0.00	12	.583	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.53
44	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	24	8.00	1	27	.852	5	1	3	0.33	12	.750	.	.	.	.	25.5	8.31
Total		73	261	3.58	61	411	.487	102	18	35	0.25	259	.865	.	.	.	.	303.0	7.23

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	7	7	1	1.75	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	10.00
2	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	10.00
3	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	7.48
10	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	9.22
12	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.50
13	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	18.0	9.39
16	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	24.5	7.71
19	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.35
20	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	3.44
22	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.30
23	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.78
27	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	2	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.25
30	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	21.5	6.50
32	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	22.5	6.97
35	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.72
37	San Jose L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.14
39	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.74
40	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.53
44	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	25.5	8.31
Total		73	0	48	48	8	0.66	64	0.88	.	.	.	.	.	303.0	7.23