Players

Paul Solomon 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
12	-	15	15	8	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	13	.154	5	2	0	0.67	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.40
3	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	7	.571	6	1	3	0.33	12	.750	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.48
5	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	12	.333	8	0	4	0.00	17	.765	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.10
6	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	15	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.62
9	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	16	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.98
11	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	3	12	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.78
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.02
14	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	2	18	.611	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.69
16	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	0	16	.938	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.64
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	0	12	1.000	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.64
19	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.92
21	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	14	.357	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.72
22	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	6	25	.320	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.06
26	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	17	.529	6	2	2	0.50	17	.882	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.10
29	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	2	15	.600	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.64
33	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	17	.294	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.83
34	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	5	16	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.12
38	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	6	22	.273	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.58
41	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	17	.294	1	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.81
44	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	16	.313	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.11
46	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	13	.615	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.33
Total		85	188	2.21	59	306	.422	32	5	17	0.06	94	.819	.	.	.	.	238.0	6.17

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.40
3	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	2	2	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	7.48
5	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.10
6	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.62
9	Nashville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.98
11	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.78
12	Burlington W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.02
14	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	7.69
16	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	2	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.64
17	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	8.64
19	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.92
21	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.72
22	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	7.06
26	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.10
29	Cincinnati W (3–2 sets)	5	0	6	6	3	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.64
33	Merritt Island W (3–2 sets)	5	2	6	8	0	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.83
34	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.12
38	Ames L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	4.58
41	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.81
44	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	1	5	6	0	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.11
46	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.33
Total		85	8	74	82	7	0.96	11	0.13	.	.	.	.	.	238.0	6.17