Players

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Tuesday, May 5th, 2026 - 09:31:21 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Heath Parker 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	16	-	-	17	14

Season 8 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
101 55th	2.16 110th	.934 80th	34 127th	4 354th

Career Honors

S102nd All-BIG-EAST

S112nd All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	5.15
3	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	7	.429	0.0	4.90
5	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	4	.250	0.0	1.10
7	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	13	.308	0.0	5.80
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	3.05
11	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	.286	0.0	2.15
13	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.25	9	.889	2	0.50	6	.333	1.0	3.05
15	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	0	0.20	14	1.000	5	1.00	14	.357	1.0	8.18
18	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	9	.222	0.0	2.95
21	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.20	9	.111	0.0	6.00
26	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	3.58
29	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	1	0.40	15	.933	4	0.80	10	.400	2.0	8.04
34	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	5	.400	0.0	5.43
39	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	5.38
Total		57	.	.	.	.	.	16	4	4	0.07	46	.913	34	0.60	103	.330	4.0	4.63

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	13	2.20	25	2	.920	0.0	5.15
3	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	19	2.41	29	2	.931	0.0	4.90
5	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	1	1.57	7	1	.857	0.0	1.10
7	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	11	2.23	26	0	1.000	0.0	5.80
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	2.09	23	2	.913	0.0	3.05
11	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	1.86	14	3	.786	0.0	2.15
13	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	5	2.08	13	0	1.000	1.0	3.05
15	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	12	2.47	19	1	.947	1.0	8.18
18	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	15	2.13	32	0	1.000	0.0	2.95
21	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	14	2.16	31	1	.968	0.0	6.00
26	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	12	1.81	32	5	.844	0.0	3.58
29	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	17	3.40	15	2.23	26	1	.962	2.0	8.04
34	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	8	2.45	11	1	.909	0.0	5.43
39	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	11	2.24	17	1	.941	0.0	5.38
Total		57	.	.	.	.	.	101	1.77	153	2.16	305	20	.934	4.0	4.63