Players

Alex McConvey 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	-	17	13	16	18

Season 9 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
957 17th	31 319th	33 29th	73 145th	44 170th

Career Honors

S92nd All-SEC

S102nd All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	5	1	0	0.33	13	1.000	33	11.00	59	.559	3.5	6.30
5	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	6	.333	5	0	0	0.00	13	1.000	40	13.33	60	.667	3.5	9.80
8	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	6	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	34	11.33	50	.680	4.0	6.54
9	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	7	.143	1	0	3	0.00	11	.727	51	17.00	69	.739	2.0	8.43
11	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	1	1.000	10	1	2	0.33	17	.882	37	12.33	62	.597	2.0	7.80
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	7	4	3	1.33	16	.813	41	13.67	60	.683	5.5	9.38
13	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	7	.286	10	4	1	1.00	20	.950	43	10.75	85	.506	8.0	6.59
16	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	7	.143	3	0	1	0.00	13	.923	56	14.00	78	.718	5.0	9.83
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	5	.200	7	2	1	0.50	16	.938	33	8.25	74	.446	5.5	5.13
20	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	3	.333	6	0	2	0.00	17	.882	51	12.75	66	.773	2.5	7.98
23	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	2	0	3	0.00	11	.727	42	14.00	59	.712	3.5	9.15
24	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	0	9	.444	9	2	2	0.50	21	.905	57	14.25	80	.713	7.0	9.52
27	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	1	-1.000	3	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	42	14.00	50	.840	3.0	8.45
28	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	11	4	3	1.33	19	.842	42	14.00	56	.750	7.0	10.00
31	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	6	.333	7	1	2	0.33	15	.867	37	12.33	60	.617	4.5	9.38
32	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	2	.500	8	2	2	0.67	16	.875	36	12.00	52	.692	3.5	7.96
36	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	4	.500	9	2	0	0.67	17	1.000	43	14.33	65	.662	5.0	10.00
37	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	7	1	2	0.33	16	.875	43	14.33	59	.729	1.5	9.26
41	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	1	6	.167	6	1	3	0.20	21	.857	57	11.40	89	.640	5.0	7.13
42	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	1	1	2	0.33	11	.818	43	14.33	59	.729	1.5	7.54
44	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	1	.000	9	2	1	0.67	18	.944	44	14.67	62	.710	2.0	8.45
46	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	1	3	-.333	4	1	0	0.25	16	1.000	52	13.00	86	.605	2.0	7.60
Total		74	31	0.42	6	88	.284	136	33	33	0.45	341	.903	957	12.93	1440	.665	87.0	8.28

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.30
5	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.80
8	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.54
9	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.43
11	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.80
12	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	9.38
13	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.59
16	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	9.83
17	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.13
20	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.98
23	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.15
24	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	9.52
27	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.45
28	Cincinnati W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	10.00
31	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	9.38
32	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	7.96
36	Denali W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	10.00
37	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	9.26
41	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	7.13
42	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	7.54
44	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.45
46	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.60
Total		74	2	42	44	6	0.59	73	0.99	.	.	.	.	.	87.0	8.28