Players

Bobby Page 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	-	15	16	7	-

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
199 107th	.467 92nd	24 75th	24 326th	71 34th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	15	.600	3	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.04
3	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	12	.417	9	0	3	0.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.47
5	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	10	-.100	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.78
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	13	.308	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.66
8	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	12	.667	5	1	2	0.33	11	.818	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.49
9	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	2	8	.125	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.46
10	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	2	11	.455	6	2	2	0.40	15	.867	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.61
12	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	9	.667	8	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.95
13	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	7	.429	11	2	1	0.67	16	.938	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.09
14	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	16	.500	1	0	3	0.00	11	.727	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.17
17	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	9	.556	5	2	1	0.67	10	.900	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.43
18	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	7	.714	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.71
22	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	12	2.40	3	16	.563	4	1	2	0.20	14	.857	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.54
25	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	15	.267	9	4	3	1.00	15	.800	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.97
26	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	4	24	.542	2	1	1	0.25	10	.900	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.57
29	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	5	18	.389	3	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.62
30	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	12	.417	4	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.00
34	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	7	-.286	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.39
35	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	16	.625	5	2	1	0.50	13	.923	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.91
39	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	3	18	.556	7	1	2	0.20	16	.875	.	.	.	.	18.5	9.45
40	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	0	16	.688	8	1	1	0.20	17	.941	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.04
44	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	13	.462	8	2	2	0.40	16	.875	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.39
45	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	16	3.20	4	22	.545	4	1	1	0.20	14	.929	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.68
Total		89	199	2.24	56	306	.467	116	24	40	0.27	279	.857	.	.	.	.	261.0	6.41

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	9.04
3	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	8.47
5	Kentucky W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.78
6	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.66
8	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.49
9	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.46
10	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.61
12	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.95
13	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	6.09
14	Teutopolis L (2–3 sets)	5	1	6	7	1	1.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.17
17	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.43
18	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.71
22	Carlsbad W (3–2 sets)	5	1	7	8	0	1.60	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	8.54
25	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.97
26	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	6.57
29	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.62
30	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	7.00
34	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.39
35	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.91
39	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	9	9	0	1.80	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	18.5	9.45
40	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.04
44	Teutopolis W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.39
45	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.68
Total		89	5	66	71	6	0.80	24	0.27	.	.	.	.	.	261.0	6.41