Players

Career Honors

S112nd All-SEC

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	3	0.50	15	.800	4	1.00	11	.364	2.0	5.65
5	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	2	2	0.67	17	.882	2	0.67	4	.500	2.0	8.75
9	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	4	0.00	9	.556	3	1.00	7	.429	0.0	7.23
10	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	3	1	1.00	14	.929	3	1.00	5	.600	3.0	8.26
15	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.33	13	.846	4	1.33	9	.444	1.0	10.00
18	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	3	1	0.75	17	.941	6	1.50	8	.750	3.0	10.00
21	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	4	0.50	20	.800	0	0.00	6	.000	2.0	10.00
25	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	10	.500	0.0	7.81
26	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	3.85
29	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	0	1	0.00	24	.958	1	0.25	9	.111	0.0	6.79
Total		35	.	.	.	.	.	54	13	18	0.37	129	.860	29	0.83	71	.408	13.0	7.83

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	14	2.50	22	0	1.000	2.0	5.65
5	Starkville W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	2.71	7	0	1.000	2.0	8.75
9	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	9	2.13	15	3	.800	0.0	7.23
10	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	11	2.23	22	1	.955	3.0	8.26
15	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	13	2.81	16	0	1.000	1.0	10.00
18	Denali W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	20	5.00	9	2.69	13	0	1.000	3.0	10.00
21	Pekin L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	19	4.75	11	2.50	14	2	.857	2.0	10.00
25	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	11	2.64	14	1	.929	0.0	7.81
26	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	9	2.13	15	2	.867	0.0	3.85
29	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	7	2.12	17	0	1.000	0.0	6.79
Total		35	.	.	.	.	.	100	2.86	100	2.42	155	9	.942	13.0	7.83