Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 16 hours and 29 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 01:30:54 AM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Curt Landes 5 Right Side (RS)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	14	15	15	-

Season 8 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
88 229th	.074 360th	8 265th	53 229th	14 361st

Career Honors

S101st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

S111st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-EAST

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	27	.000	5	2	0	0.50	13	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.97
5	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	6	20	.100	2	1	0	0.33	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.67
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	6	19	-.053	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.14
11	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	0	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.64
13	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	16	.188	2	1	3	0.25	10	.700	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.00
15	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	28	.107	9	2	3	0.40	19	.842	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.56
18	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	13	2.60	12	43	.023	6	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.92
21	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	12	2.40	6	28	.214	6	2	3	0.40	17	.824	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.20
26	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	6	15	-.133	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.97
29	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	5	31	.194	9	0	4	0.00	19	.789	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.91
34	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	9	23	-.043	2	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.28
39	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	17	.118	0	0	3	0.00	6	.500	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.68
Total		48	88	1.83	68	272	.074	46	8	27	0.17	143	.811	.	.	.	.	103.0	4.58

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 8)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.97
5	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.67
9	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.14
11	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.64
13	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.00
15	Portland L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	9	1.80	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	7.56
18	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	5.92
21	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	5.20
26	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.97
29	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.91
34	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	3.28
39	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.68
Total		48	0	14	14	3	0.29	53	1.10	.	.	.	.	.	103.0	4.58