Players

Doug Rogers 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	16	15	7	-

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	5	-.200	1	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.43
3	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	4	16	.125	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.10
5	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	7	16	.000	6	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.45
6	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	7	.286	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.37
7	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	1	12	.667	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.81
9	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	9	-.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.00
10	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	2	19	.632	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.42
11	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	2	14	.571	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.54
13	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	1	13	.385	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.58
14	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	1	15	.667	10	0	0	0.00	19	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.0	10.00
17	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	5	21	.190	2	1	5	0.25	10	.500	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.50
18	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	16	.563	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.51
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	9	.667	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.02
22	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	19	.316	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.19
25	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	4	8	-.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.88
29	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	14	.429	12	3	2	0.75	21	.905	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.11
34	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	19	.368	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.51
35	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	8	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.32
39	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	5	19	.368	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.12
Total		76	145	1.91	53	259	.355	31	5	10	0.07	69	.855	.	.	.	.	187.0	5.31

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.43
3	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	2	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.10
5	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.45
6	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.37
7	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	2	3	5	0	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.81
9	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	1.00
10	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	5.42
11	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	4.54
13	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.58
14	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	1	8	9	0	2.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	16.0	10.00
17	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	2	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.50
18	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.51
21	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.02
22	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.19
25	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	2	2	4	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.88
29	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	0	0.75	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.11
34	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.51
35	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.32
39	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	7.12
Total		76	9	56	65	11	0.86	12	0.16	.	.	.	.	.	187.0	5.31