Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	12	.667	0.0	4.08
5	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	13	.231	0.0	5.93
7	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	.286	0.0	2.15
9	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	0	0.40	18	1.000	3	0.60	7	.429	2.0	2.93
10	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	3	0.00	13	.769	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	4.04
15	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	2	0	0.40	14	1.000	3	0.60	7	.429	2.0	1.85
17	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	4	.000	0.0	5.50
18	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	1	0.25	10	.900	2	0.50	5	.400	1.0	6.15
23	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	4.20
29	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	3	1.00	8	.375	0.0	2.38
Total		40	.	.	.	.	.	24	5	6	0.13	71	.915	31	0.78	75	.413	5.0	3.92

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	13	2.14	29	1	.966	0.0	4.08
5	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.60	14	2.10	30	3	.900	0.0	5.93
7	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	1.90	29	3	.897	0.0	2.15
9	Mat-Su W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	12	1.76	34	5	.853	2.0	2.93
10	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	1.96	26	3	.885	0.0	4.04
15	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	10	1.72	36	6	.833	2.0	1.85
17	San Diego W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	12	2.03	33	1	.970	0.0	5.50
18	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	13	3.25	10	1.90	29	4	.862	1.0	6.15
23	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	11	2.00	25	5	.800	0.0	4.20
29	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	10	1.67	30	6	.800	0.0	2.38
Total		40	.	.	.	.	.	72	1.80	113	1.91	301	37	.877	5.0	3.92