Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
5	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	2.15
6	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.40	10	.700	0.0	4.10
8	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	1	3	0.20	21	.857	2	0.40	4	.500	1.0	5.55
11	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	4	1.33	9	.444	0.0	6.73
15	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	5	1.25	7	.714	0.0	5.68
18	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	12	.333	0.0	2.70
21	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	4	.750	0.0	6.48
29	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.33	9	.889	3	1.00	4	.750	1.0	2.95
Total		31	.	.	.	.	.	19	2	9	0.06	53	.830	30	0.97	55	.545	2.0	4.54

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
5	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	1.88	17	2	.882	0.0	2.15
6	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	15	2.06	33	3	.909	0.0	4.10
8	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	15	3.00	12	1.87	31	4	.871	1.0	5.55
11	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	14	2.25	28	0	1.000	0.0	6.73
15	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	14	2.06	31	1	.968	0.0	5.68
18	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	6	1.94	17	1	.941	0.0	2.70
21	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	3.00	11	2.08	25	2	.920	0.0	6.48
29	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	11	2.04	26	1	.962	1.0	2.95
Total		31	.	.	.	.	.	60	1.94	89	2.03	208	14	.933	2.0	4.54