Players

Jonas Gutierrez 5 Setter (S)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
14	-	14	11	14	14

Season 10 Totals
ASSISTS	KILLS	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
1,188 1st	29 324th	23 91st	84 103rd	56 98th

Career Honors

S102nd All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	7	2	1	0.67	16	.938	39	13.00	65	.600	4.0	9.31
3	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	4	-.250	8	0	2	0.00	17	.882	35	11.67	59	.593	1.0	7.49
4	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	6	2	2	0.67	12	.833	39	13.00	52	.750	2.5	8.48
6	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	7	.286	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	53	13.25	83	.639	5.5	8.57
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	4	.500	3	0	2	0.00	14	.857	56	14.00	82	.683	3.5	8.94
9	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	8	0	3	0.00	13	.769	40	13.33	54	.741	2.5	9.22
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	5	.000	9	1	5	0.25	17	.706	63	15.75	88	.716	3.5	9.02
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	6	4	3	1.33	10	.700	43	14.33	63	.683	8.0	10.00
13	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	2	7	-.143	6	0	1	0.00	14	.929	33	8.25	83	.398	2.0	3.84
14	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	6	-.167	9	1	1	0.33	14	.929	38	12.67	54	.704	4.0	9.24
17	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	8	.000	11	2	1	0.40	24	.958	59	11.80	90	.656	4.0	7.73
20	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	4	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	29	9.67	40	.725	3.5	6.30
23	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	45	15.00	60	.750	3.5	9.32
24	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	1	5	.000	12	1	4	0.20	23	.826	63	12.60	97	.649	2.0	7.48
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	4	.250	4	1	1	0.25	11	.909	53	13.25	89	.596	2.5	7.64
27	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	11	.182	5	1	0	0.20	14	1.000	61	12.20	89	.685	5.5	7.54
32	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	0	6	.333	4	1	2	0.20	13	.846	59	11.80	85	.694	3.5	6.56
34	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	0.00	0	2	.000	3	1	1	0.20	12	.917	62	12.40	95	.653	2.5	7.34
37	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	2	0.50	0	6	.333	5	2	2	0.50	14	.857	60	15.00	84	.714	4.5	8.80
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	5	.200	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	47	15.67	63	.746	1.0	8.26
42	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	0	0.00	0	6	.000	1	0	3	0.00	9	.667	67	16.75	90	.744	3.0	8.57
44	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	0	5	.200	9	3	1	0.75	18	.944	47	11.75	71	.662	4.5	6.96
46	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	45	15.00	70	.643	1.5	8.66
47	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	3	8	.000	3	1	2	0.25	13	.846	52	13.00	75	.693	5.5	8.64
Total		91	29	0.32	11	120	.150	132	23	41	0.25	322	.873	1188	13.05	1781	.667	83.5	8.08

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.31
3	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	7.49
4	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	6	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	8.48
6	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.57
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	8.94
9	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	2	1	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	9.22
10	Pekin W (3–1 sets)	4	1	1	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.02
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	10.00
13	St. Charles L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.84
14	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	1	2.00	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	9.24
17	San Diego W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	7.73
20	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.30
23	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.32
24	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	7.48
26	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.64
27	Pekin L (2–3 sets)	5	2	1	3	2	0.60	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	7.54
32	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	6.56
34	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	7.34
37	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	8.80
39	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	8.26
42	San Jose W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	1	1.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	8.57
44	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	2	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	6.96
46	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	8.66
47	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	8.64
Total		91	7	49	56	10	0.62	84	0.92	.	.	.	.	.	83.5	8.08