Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	5	11	-.364	1	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.20
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	7	19	-.263	2	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.77
9	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	4	17	-.176	7	1	2	0.20	16	.875	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.26
10	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	16	.000	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.28
14	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	7	16	-.188	2	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.13
15	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	15	.267	3	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.86
17	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	4	8	-.500	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	0.5	2.28
18	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	7	32	-.094	12	3	3	0.75	19	.842	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.97
21	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	6	27	-.148	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.14
22	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	3	13	-.154	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.69
29	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	6	23	-.087	4	1	0	0.20	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.20
Total		40	27	0.68	53	197	-.132	37	5	10	0.13	109	.908	.	.	.	.	38.5	3.62

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.20
6	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.77
9	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0	1	0	0.20	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.26
10	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	2.28
14	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.13
15	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.86
17	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	0.5	2.28
18	Merritt Island W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	7	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.97
21	Mendon W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	3.14
22	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.69
29	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	4.20
Total		40	1	11	12	2	0.30	44	1.10	.	.	.	.	.	38.5	3.62