Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
15	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	10	2.50	10	37	.000	8	1	1	0.25	15	.933	.	.	.	.	12.5	5.74
16	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	21	.238	5	0	3	0.00	14	.786	2	0.50	2	1.000	9.5	4.26
17	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	7	23	-.087	0	0	1	0.00	5	.800	1	0.33	2	.500	6.5	3.31
21	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	24	.083	8	0	1	0.00	14	.929	0	0.00	1	.000	7.5	4.49
25	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	9	38	.000	5	1	5	0.20	15	.667	.	.	.	.	10.0	3.71
31	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	3	22	.364	5	2	2	0.67	11	.818	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	6.20
Total		22	51	2.32	38	165	.079	31	4	13	0.18	74	.824	3	0.14	6	.500	59.0	4.62

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
15	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	14	2.07	30	4	.867	12.5	5.74
16	Carlsbad L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	18	2.02	41	4	.902	9.5	4.26
17	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	15	2.07	27	3	.889	6.5	3.31
21	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	9	1.77	26	5	.808	7.5	4.49
25	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	14	2.16	31	1	.968	10.0	3.71
31	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	16	2.03	31	4	.871	13.0	6.20
Total		22	0	8	8	0	0.36	15	0.68	86	2.03	186	21	.887	59.0	4.62