Players

Aarav Glass 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	13	13	13	14	1

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	3	9	-.111	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.28
4	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	21	.333	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.40
5	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	6	24	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.18
7	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	7	25	.120	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	5.15
8	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	5	25	.240	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.64
10	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	6	26	.154	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.26
12	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	16	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.67
14	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	18	.278	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	4.77
16	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	4	16	.125	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.93
17	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	14	2.80	5	24	.375	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	7.41
21	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	17	.353	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.82
23	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	9	28	.214	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	17.5	5.68
25	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	21	.381	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13.5	6.07
27	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	3	18	.222	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	2.68
29	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	3	22	.364	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.03
31	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	18	.056	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.29
32	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	4	20	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	7.07
34	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	12	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.30
37	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	16	.375	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.15
41	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	3.24
42	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	1	9	.444	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.72
Total		77	175	2.27	79	395	.243	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	219.0	4.80

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	6	2.00	NA	NA	7	1	.857	6.0	3.28
4	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	NA	NA	26	2	.923	12.0	5.40
5	Mendon L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	NA	NA	18	2	.889	9.0	4.18
7	Baton Rouge W (3–2 sets)	5	1	3	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	NA	NA	23	1	.957	13.5	5.15
8	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	8	2.67	NA	NA	13	2	.846	12.5	6.64
10	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	NA	NA	21	2	.905	13.0	5.26
12	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	NA	NA	16	1	.938	8.0	4.67
14	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	6	1.50	NA	NA	33	3	.909	10.5	4.77
16	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	3	1.00	NA	NA	17	1	.941	7.0	3.93
17	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	7	1.40	NA	NA	20	0	1.000	17.5	7.41
21	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	17	4.25	NA	NA	19	0	1.000	11.5	5.82
23	Burlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	12	2.40	NA	NA	27	3	.889	17.5	5.68
25	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	9	2.25	NA	NA	21	2	.905	13.5	6.07
27	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	2	0.50	8	2.00	NA	NA	28	4	.857	8.0	2.68
29	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	NA	NA	21	1	.952	14.0	6.03
31	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	NA	NA	22	0	1.000	7.0	5.29
32	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	NA	NA	20	1	.950	12.0	7.07
34	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	NA	NA	27	3	.889	5.5	2.30
37	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	6	1.50	NA	NA	39	6	.846	8.5	3.15
41	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	NA	NA	27	3	.889	7.0	3.24
42	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	NA	NA	23	3	.870	5.5	2.72
Total		77	2	48	50	4	0.65	135	1.75	0	0.00	468	41	.912	219.0	4.80