Players

Max Long 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
10	12	12	13	15	6

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
135 164th	.133 314th	17 138th	92 65th	36 223rd

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	23	.304	12	0	3	0.00	21	.857	1	0.25	2	.500	11.5	5.45
3	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	4	33	.212	3	1	2	0.25	12	.833	.	.	.	.	15.0	5.54
4	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	7	.286	8	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.69
6	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	1	14	.286	6	3	5	0.75	16	.688	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.96
7	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	12	.250	1	0	2	0.00	9	.778	0	0.00	1	.000	5.5	2.68
9	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	4	16	.000	0	0	4	0.00	8	.500	.	.	.	.	4.5	1.69
10	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	14	.071	0	0	0	0.00	4	1.000	.	.	.	.	4.5	2.36
11	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	1	7	.286	3	1	1	0.33	10	.900	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.46
13	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	11	.182	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	2	0.67	2	1.000	5.5	1.92
18	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	7	23	.174	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.17
21	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	8	28	-.107	6	2	3	0.40	18	.833	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.25
22	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	6	25	.080	7	2	3	0.40	19	.842	.	.	.	.	10.0	2.80
25	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	9	27	-.111	5	1	3	0.25	14	.786	.	.	.	.	7.0	2.62
26	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	0	14	.571	4	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.62
31	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	19	.053	1	1	3	0.33	8	.625	.	.	.	.	5.0	1.56
33	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	17	.059	2	2	0	0.67	7	1.000	2	0.67	3	.667	8.0	2.36
34	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	9	23	-.130	10	0	3	0.00	20	.850	0	0.00	2	.000	6.0	2.51
36	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	16	.313	3	1	1	0.33	11	.909	1	0.33	1	1.000	8.0	4.37
39	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	13	.308	8	1	2	0.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.45
41	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	13	-.077	7	1	3	0.33	14	.786	.	.	.	.	4.5	4.15
44	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	4	17	.294	4	0	5	0.00	13	.615	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.86
46	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	18	.222	10	1	1	0.33	16	.938	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.02
Total		75	135	1.80	83	390	.133	102	17	48	0.23	274	.825	6	0.08	11	.545	170.0	3.89

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	9	1.76	21	4	.810	11.5	5.45
3	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	6	6	0	1.50	6	1.50	9	1.83	30	4	.867	15.0	5.54
4	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	6	2.00	4	1.64	11	1	.909	5.5	3.69
6	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	7	1.75	12	2.31	26	0	1.000	9.5	4.96
7	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	7	1.88	17	2	.882	5.5	2.68
9	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	8	1.59	27	4	.852	4.5	1.69
10	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	5	2.00	15	0	1.000	4.5	2.36
11	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	11	3.67	7	2.11	18	1	.944	5.0	4.46
13	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	5	1.69	16	3	.813	5.5	1.92
18	Merritt Island L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	.	.	7	2.07	14	2	.857	12.0	6.17
21	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	6	1.20	13	1.89	35	7	.800	8.5	3.25
22	Antioch L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	16	1.97	37	4	.892	10.0	2.80
25	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	11	1.78	32	5	.844	7.0	2.62
26	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	10	2.43	14	1	.929	8.5	6.62
31	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	1.68	22	6	.727	5.0	1.56
33	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	11	1.90	29	2	.931	8.0	2.36
34	San Diego L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	13	1.68	40	7	.825	6.0	2.51
36	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	10	2.15	26	1	.962	8.0	4.37
39	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	8	2.60	10	1	.900	8.5	6.45
41	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	11	2.21	19	3	.842	4.5	4.15
44	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	13	1.90	29	5	.828	9.5	4.86
46	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	3	2.00	10	1	.900	8.0	5.02
Total		75	0	36	36	3	0.48	92	1.23	200	1.92	498	64	.871	170.0	3.89