Players

Aidan Paris 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	13	10	15	13	9

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	25	.240	5	0	0	0.00	16	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	13.0	6.74
3	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	24	.417	8	2	3	0.67	14	.786	.	.	.	.	16.5	8.64
7	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	16	.563	1	1	2	0.33	7	.714	1	0.33	1	1.000	13.5	6.07
9	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	21	4.20	5	32	.500	2	1	0	0.20	10	1.000	1	0.20	1	1.000	23.5	7.62
11	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	2	17	.588	1	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.16
12	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	4	19	.526	4	0	3	0.00	10	.700	1	0.33	1	1.000	14.5	7.19
13	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	17	3.40	3	32	.438	2	0	6	0.00	13	.538	.	.	.	.	18.0	5.11
14	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	0	18	.778	5	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	17.0	9.14
18	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	0	17	.824	2	1	0	0.33	6	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	16.5	7.67
19	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	13	3.25	4	18	.500	1	0	4	0.00	9	.556	0	0.00	1	.000	15.5	6.07
22	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	17	4.25	4	28	.464	6	1	3	0.25	14	.786	.	.	.	.	19.0	7.59
23	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	13	.154	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.62
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	13	.462	10	4	0	1.33	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.93
26	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	15	3.00	5	25	.400	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	0	0.00	1	.000	17.5	6.30
29	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	29	5.80	3	40	.650	2	2	3	0.40	15	.800	.	.	.	.	31.5	7.72
32	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	8	24	.125	1	0	2	0.00	7	.714	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.64
36	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	21	5.25	3	31	.581	2	0	5	0.00	11	.545	0	0.00	1	.000	22.5	7.21
41	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	7	23	.217	4	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.41
46	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	20	4.00	6	32	.438	3	1	0	0.20	10	1.000	0	0.00	1	.000	21.5	6.30
Total		72	278	3.86	69	447	.468	66	13	41	0.18	207	.802	4	0.06	9	.444	318.5	6.85

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	17	2.28	29	2	.931	13.0	6.74
3	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	3	1.00	6	2.20	10	1	.900	16.5	8.64
7	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	6	2.00	8	1.80	20	5	.750	13.5	6.07
9	Sheboygan L (2–3 sets)	5	1	1	2	0	0.40	5	1.00	14	2.46	24	0	1.000	23.5	7.62
11	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	10	1.96	25	4	.840	12.5	6.16
12	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	9	2.00	19	3	.842	14.5	7.19
13	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	3	0.60	13	1.90	31	4	.871	18.0	5.11
14	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	3	1.00	16	2.35	26	1	.962	17.0	9.14
18	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	8	2.14	14	3	.786	16.5	7.67
19	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	.	.	15	2.15	34	4	.882	15.5	6.07
22	Dallas L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	16	2.12	33	4	.879	19.0	7.59
23	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	1	0.67	2	0.67	11	2.08	24	2	.917	8.5	4.62
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	7	2.33	12	1	.917	13.0	6.93
26	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	3	0.60	15	2.09	34	3	.912	17.5	6.30
29	Merritt Island L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	2	0.20	7	1.40	21	2.16	43	4	.907	31.5	7.72
32	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	12	2.23	22	2	.909	11.5	6.64
36	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	5	1.25	16	1.89	37	7	.811	22.5	7.21
41	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	17	2.18	33	3	.909	13.0	6.41
46	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	2	0.40	21	2.02	43	6	.860	21.5	6.30
Total		72	2	51	53	4	0.74	65	0.90	252	2.11	513	59	.885	318.5	6.85