Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
3	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	4	18	-.167	2	0	2	0.00	7	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	1.5	3.84
14	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	9	21	-.238	1	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.20
15	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	6	14	-.286	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	.	.	.	.	2.5	2.58
17	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	7	.429	3	2	2	0.67	9	.778	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.53
19	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	13	.000	3	2	1	0.67	7	.857	.	.	.	.	5.0	1.98
21	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	20	.150	10	1	3	0.20	23	.870	1	0.20	2	.500	10.0	4.25
22	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	5	17	-.118	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	0	0.00	1	.000	3.0	1.84
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	7	24	.000	4	1	1	0.25	12	.917	0	0.00	1	.000	8.5	2.66
31	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	7	21	-.143	2	1	2	0.25	11	.818	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.01
36	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	8	1.60	5	21	.143	2	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	8.0	2.20
Total		37	43	1.16	51	176	-.045	28	7	20	0.19	105	.810	1	0.03	5	.200	59.5	3.01

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
3	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	8	2.67	9	2.11	19	1	.947	1.5	3.84
14	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	4	1.00	16	2.20	35	2	.943	8.0	4.20
15	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	6	2.05	19	1	.947	2.5	2.58
17	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	16	2.10	30	3	.900	6.5	3.53
19	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12	1.90	29	3	.897	5.0	1.98
21	Dallas W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	5	1.00	18	2.13	40	4	.900	10.0	4.25
22	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	6	1.50	26	4	.846	3.0	1.84
26	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	4	1.00	15	1.88	43	5	.884	8.5	2.66
31	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	5	1.25	11	1.88	33	1	.970	6.5	3.01
36	Santa Clara L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	15	1.93	41	2	.951	8.0	2.20
Total		37	0	19	19	2	0.51	38	1.03	124	1.97	315	26	.917	59.5	3.01