Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	1	5	-.200	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	28	9.33	69	.406	2.0	5.16
8	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	5	1	1	0.33	13	.923	30	10.00	68	.441	1.0	4.64
10	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	0	5	.800	3	1	2	0.33	10	.800	20	6.67	61	.328	5.0	2.90
15	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	4	.250	8	1	4	0.20	20	.800	36	7.20	101	.356	2.5	3.00
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	10	1	1	0.33	19	.947	29	9.67	75	.387	5.0	6.82
21	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	2	1.000	10	4	3	1.33	16	.813	29	9.67	45	.644	7.0	6.31
22	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	5	1.00	0	11	.455	10	1	3	0.20	23	.870	56	11.20	108	.519	6.0	6.48
29	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	10	1	2	0.33	19	.895	34	11.33	79	.430	4.0	8.24
36	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	3	0.60	1	7	.286	11	3	1	0.60	25	.960	47	9.40	94	.500	6.5	5.73
41	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	1	7	.429	10	2	4	0.50	20	.800	48	12.00	82	.585	7.0	8.23
Total		37	22	0.59	3	49	.388	79	15	23	0.41	175	.869	357	9.65	782	.457	46.0	5.75

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Kentucky L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.16
8	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.64
10	Nashville L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	2.90
15	Denali L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	3.00
18	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.82
21	Dallas W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.31
22	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	6.48
29	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	8.24
36	New Orleans L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	6	1.20	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.73
41	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	8.23
Total		37	1	16	17	1	0.46	28	0.76	.	.	.	.	.	46.0	5.75