Players

Session 13 orders deadline in 5 hours and 1 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Sunday, May 3rd, 2026 - 12:58:55 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Biggs Darklighter 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	15	13	15	10	7

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
106 204th	.050 361st	4 346th	50 233rd	30 251st

Career Honors

S122nd All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	11	32	-.156	1	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	6.0	1.85
4	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	18	.000	1	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.30
7	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	6	23	.043	4	1	3	0.33	11	.727	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.84
11	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	8	26	.038	2	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	10.5	6.31
15	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	7	34	.118	6	1	2	0.33	10	.800	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.09
16	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	17	5.67	7	35	.286	0	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.0	7.27
19	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	10	28	-.179	0	0	0	0.00	4	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	1.97
21	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	23	.087	1	0	3	0.00	7	.571	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.01
26	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	0.00	7	19	-.368	2	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	1.5	3.54
33	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	11	2.75	9	41	.049	9	1	2	0.25	19	.895	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.71
35	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	3	13	.077	2	0	2	0.00	12	.833	1	0.25	2	.500	7.5	4.17
39	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	7	23	.174	7	0	4	0.00	17	.765	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.45
40	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	13	2.60	4	26	.346	1	0	2	0.00	10	.800	1	0.20	1	1.000	14.0	4.01
Total		46	106	2.30	89	341	.050	36	4	21	0.09	128	.836	3	0.07	4	.750	126.0	4.66

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	1.65	17	2	.882	6.0	1.85
4	Starkville L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	5	1.67	14	2.25	24	3	.875	7.5	4.30
7	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	6	1.58	19	3	.842	9.0	3.84
11	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	13	2.19	27	3	.889	10.5	6.31
15	San Diego L (0–3 sets)	3	1	4	5	0	1.67	5	1.67	9	1.76	25	3	.880	15.0	7.09
16	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	14	2.23	30	2	.933	17.0	7.27
19	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	15	1.96	28	6	.786	5.0	1.97
21	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	14	2.07	28	3	.893	7.0	4.01
26	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	17	2.15	34	3	.912	1.5	3.54
33	Manitowoc L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	8	2.00	17	2.18	34	2	.941	13.0	6.71
35	Burlington L (1–3 sets)	4	1	5	6	0	1.50	6	1.50	13	2.10	29	1	.966	7.5	4.17
39	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	3	0.60	23	2.38	34	4	.882	13.0	5.45
40	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	6	1.20	13	1.88	33	5	.848	14.0	4.01
Total		46	2	28	30	3	0.65	50	1.09	172	2.06	362	40	.890	126.0	4.66