Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	8	25	-.120	1	0	2	0.00	5	.600	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.00
5	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	1	7	.286	3	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.72
8	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	10	.000	4	2	1	0.67	9	.889	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.21
11	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	6	24	.167	5	0	4	0.00	17	.765	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.14
14	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	5	11	-.182	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.07
15	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	2	0.40	4	15	-.133	3	0	5	0.00	14	.643	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.63
17	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	1	0.25	2	5	-.200	6	1	1	0.25	14	.929	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.57
22	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	5	25	.040	6	0	3	0.00	17	.824	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.72
26	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	2	0	3	0.00	10	.700	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.27
29	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	27	.296	5	0	6	0.00	14	.571	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.82
34	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	4	13	-.231	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.11
Total		43	47	1.09	42	166	.030	41	3	30	0.07	134	.776	.	.	.	.	63.5	5.02

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.00
5	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.72
8	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	6.21
11	Mendon L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	1	0.40	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.14
14	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	5	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	6.07
15	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	7	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	4.63
17	New Orleans L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	3.57
22	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	3	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	5.72
26	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	7	2.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.27
29	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.82
34	Manitowoc L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	8	2.67	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.11
Total		43	2	23	25	2	0.58	52	1.21	.	.	.	.	.	63.5	5.02