Players

Daniel DeGoodprice 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	15	-	-	15	15

Season 10 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
153 15th	2.17 101st	.927 75th	90 79th	11 218th

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	7	.571	0.0	6.61
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	.778	0.0	5.58
4	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	7	.286	0.0	5.30
6	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	7	.714	5	1.67	7	.714	0.0	6.23
8	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	2	0.33	11	.818	4	1.33	4	1.000	1.0	3.93
9	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	0	1	0.00	20	.950	1	0.20	4	.250	0.0	7.51
11	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	4	0.80	6	.667	0.0	6.05
12	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3	2	1.00	15	.867	3	1.00	4	.750	3.0	5.46
14	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	.556	0.0	8.91
16	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	8	.375	0.0	6.25
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	9	.444	0.0	5.40
19	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	5.30
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	16	4	5	0.80	31	.839	1	0.20	8	.125	4.0	6.10
22	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	13	.923	4	1.00	7	.571	0.0	6.55
25	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	7	1.40	9	.778	0.0	6.15
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	0	0.33	13	1.000	7	2.33	8	.875	1.0	4.23
30	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.20	11	.909	7	1.40	9	.778	1.0	3.85
32	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	3	.000	0.0	4.83
34	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	1	1	0.25	12	.917	4	1.00	4	1.000	1.0	3.40
37	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	2	.500	0.0	2.95
39	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	11	.636	0.0	8.02
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	.857	0.0	7.36
45	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	6	.333	0.0	3.90
Total		85	.	.	.	.	.	61	11	19	0.13	157	.879	90	1.06	152	.592	11.0	5.65

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	10	2.15	20	2	.900	0.0	6.61
3	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	5	2.00	13	1	.923	0.0	5.58
4	Alton W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	7	1.96	25	1	.960	0.0	5.30
6	Mat-Su W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	12	2.09	22	4	.818	0.0	6.23
8	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	5	2.14	14	0	1.000	1.0	3.93
9	Starkville W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	16	3.20	8	2.25	20	0	1.000	0.0	7.51
11	Spokane L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	12	2.23	22	3	.864	0.0	6.05
12	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.13	15	2	.867	3.0	5.46
14	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	10	3.33	8	2.40	15	0	1.000	0.0	8.91
16	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	16	2.30	30	1	.967	0.0	6.25
17	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	10	1.96	27	2	.926	0.0	5.40
19	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	14	2.13	30	2	.933	0.0	5.30
21	Santa Clara W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.40	17	2.19	36	2	.944	4.0	6.10
22	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	17	2.32	31	2	.935	0.0	6.55
25	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	14	2.22	23	2	.913	0.0	6.15
26	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	2.15	20	1	.950	1.0	4.23
30	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	15	2.13	32	3	.906	1.0	3.85
32	Schenectady W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	4	1.75	16	1	.938	0.0	4.83
34	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	14	2.03	30	2	.933	1.0	3.40
37	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12	2.00	29	4	.862	0.0	2.95
39	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	13	2.76	17	0	1.000	0.0	8.02
40	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	2.60	10	0	1.000	0.0	7.36
45	Nashville L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	15	2.32	25	3	.880	0.0	3.90
Total		85	.	.	.	.	.	153	1.80	254	2.17	522	38	.927	11.0	5.65