Players

Lewis Olson 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	16	-	-	16	14

Season 10 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
156 13th	2.35 18th	.964 13th	81 85th	26 65th

Career Honors

S113rd All-TMVL1st All-SEC

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	16	2	2	0.50	26	.923	2	0.50	3	.667	2.0	9.60
6	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	2	5	0.40	19	.737	7	1.40	14	.500	2.0	4.50
7	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	14	.929	4	1.33	5	.800	1.0	4.06
8	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	17	3	3	1.00	23	.870	5	1.67	7	.714	3.0	9.43
10	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	3	0.25	18	.833	5	1.25	12	.417	1.0	8.28
12	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	2	0.00	15	.867	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	6.05
13	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	6	0.20	19	.684	7	1.40	9	.778	1.0	8.00
14	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.33	14	.929	2	0.67	5	.400	1.0	5.25
17	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	2	0.25	15	.867	6	1.50	12	.500	1.0	5.76
19	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	3	1	0.75	15	.933	2	0.50	3	.667	3.0	6.06
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	4	0.00	11	.636	2	0.67	4	.500	0.0	6.68
23	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	6	2.00	9	.667	0.0	6.49
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	3	0.00	15	.800	2	0.67	6	.333	0.0	8.03
26	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	5	3	1.00	24	.875	4	0.80	6	.667	5.0	8.26
31	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	3	1.00	6	.500	1.0	6.23
32	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	3	0.33	11	.727	5	1.67	7	.714	1.0	5.56
34	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	2	0.25	14	.857	4	1.00	8	.500	1.0	4.85
36	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	1	0.50	19	.947	1	0.25	4	.250	2.0	6.73
39	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	3	0.00	10	.700	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	6.28
41	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	2	0.25	18	.889	4	1.00	6	.667	1.0	5.53
44	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	3	1.00	6	.500	0.0	7.31
46	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	1	0.00	15	.933	6	1.20	7	.857	0.0	7.28
Total		81	.	.	.	.	.	137	26	51	0.32	351	.855	81	1.00	146	.555	26.0	6.65

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 10)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	20	5.00	10	2.37	19	1	.947	2.0	9.60
6	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	9	2.19	16	0	1.000	2.0	4.50
7	Merritt Island W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	13	2.27	26	0	1.000	1.0	4.06
8	Teutopolis W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	4	2.38	8	0	1.000	3.0	9.43
10	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	12	2.42	19	1	.947	1.0	8.28
12	San Jose W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	6	2.18	11	1	.909	0.0	6.05
13	Kentucky L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	18	2.50	26	1	.962	1.0	8.00
14	New Orleans W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	2.18	11	1	.909	1.0	5.25
17	Sheboygan L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	11	2.31	16	1	.938	1.0	5.76
19	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	11	2.53	17	0	1.000	3.0	6.06
21	Ames L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	8	2.33	15	1	.933	0.0	6.68
23	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	2.55	11	0	1.000	0.0	6.49
25	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	4	2.50	6	0	1.000	0.0	8.03
26	Arlington L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	14	2.55	20	1	.950	5.0	8.26
31	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	5	2.22	9	1	.889	1.0	6.23
32	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	8	2.40	15	0	1.000	1.0	5.56
34	Teutopolis L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	8	2.10	20	1	.950	1.0	4.85
36	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	9	2.16	19	1	.947	2.0	6.73
39	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	11	2.47	17	0	1.000	0.0	6.28
41	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	14	2.41	22	2	.909	1.0	5.53
44	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	8	2.24	17	0	1.000	0.0	7.31
46	Cincinnati L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	11	2.47	17	0	1.000	0.0	7.28
Total		81	.	.	.	.	.	156	1.93	206	2.35	357	13	.964	26.0	6.65