Players

Amari Castleton 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
17	17	17	17	16	8

Season 11 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
331 14th	.531 37th	19 117th	77 119th	69 55th

Career Honors

S123rd All-TMVL2nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	12	.750	9	1	1	0.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.56
2	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	6	27	.333	2	1	1	0.25	10	.900	.	.	.	.	17.0	6.39
4	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	15	3.00	4	23	.478	3	0	3	0.00	12	.750	1	0.20	1	1.000	18.5	6.01
5	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	1	15	.533	8	1	1	0.33	14	.929	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.99
7	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	9	3.00	2	11	.636	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	1	0.33	1	1.000	11.0	7.69
8	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	13	3.25	5	21	.381	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.72
10	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	19	.474	0	0	2	0.00	6	.667	0	0.00	1	.000	12.5	7.18
11	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	17	3.40	8	35	.257	12	2	2	0.40	21	.905	0	0.00	1	.000	21.5	7.43
13	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	12	3.00	4	17	.471	6	3	1	0.75	17	.941	2	0.50	2	1.000	15.0	6.11
14	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	1	16	.563	10	1	1	0.33	17	.941	.	.	.	.	12.5	8.57
18	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	5	21	.381	5	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	15.5	9.43
19	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	21	5.25	4	28	.607	1	0	1	0.00	10	.900	0	0.00	1	.000	23.5	8.69
22	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	23	5.75	3	27	.741	4	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	24.0	7.51
23	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	19	.526	2	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.85
25	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	7	23	.348	4	1	2	0.25	14	.857	1	0.25	1	1.000	18.5	7.27
26	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	14	4.67	0	17	.824	5	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	15.0	9.03
29	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	22	5.50	1	28	.750	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	1	0.25	1	1.000	23.5	8.10
33	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	13	4.33	3	16	.625	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	15.0	8.43
34	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	3	15	.333	9	0	2	0.00	18	.889	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.23
38	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	4	21	.333	1	0	3	0.00	8	.625	1	0.33	1	1.000	11.0	6.07
39	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	20	6.67	0	21	.952	6	2	2	0.67	10	.800	.	.	.	.	25.0	9.50
41	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	18	4.50	2	24	.667	6	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	20.5	7.94
44	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	13	4.33	0	14	.929	4	1	0	0.33	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	16.0	8.82
46	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	12	.000	9	3	1	1.00	16	.938	.	.	.	.	8.0	2.55
Total		85	331	3.89	75	482	.531	119	19	36	0.22	301	.880	7	0.08	10	.700	386.0	7.42

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	4	1.33	12	2.26	19	3	.842	11.5	7.56
2	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	2	0.50	12	2.15	26	2	.923	17.0	6.39
4	Portland W (3–2 sets)	5	0	7	7	1	1.40	7	1.40	14	1.93	30	6	.800	18.5	6.01
5	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	11	2.56	16	0	1.000	11.0	7.99
7	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	14	2.50	18	2	.889	11.0	7.69
8	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	13	2.25	24	2	.917	15.5	6.72
10	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	11	2.41	17	0	1.000	12.5	7.18
11	Arlington W (3–2 sets)	5	0	5	5	1	1.00	4	0.80	15	2.17	30	1	.967	21.5	7.43
13	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	11	2.38	16	2	.875	15.0	6.11
14	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	7	2.50	12	0	1.000	12.5	8.57
18	Sheboygan W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	7	2.33	12	2.50	20	1	.950	15.5	9.43
19	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	2	0.50	21	2.55	29	1	.966	23.5	8.69
22	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	21	2.16	38	5	.868	24.0	7.51
23	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	2	0.67	10	2.39	18	0	1.000	15.0	7.85
25	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	5	5	0	1.25	4	1.00	15	2.09	32	3	.906	18.5	7.27
26	Nashville W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	11	2.63	16	0	1.000	15.0	9.03
29	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	14	2.10	31	3	.903	23.5	8.10
33	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	1	1.33	3	1.00	8	2.25	20	0	1.000	15.0	8.43
34	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	3	0.75	17	2.38	29	0	1.000	9.5	5.23
38	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	16	2.32	28	2	.929	11.0	6.07
39	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	3	1.00	8	2.38	13	1	.923	25.0	9.50
41	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	2	1.00	3	0.75	12	2.14	28	1	.964	20.5	7.94
44	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	2	0.67	12	2.59	17	0	1.000	16.0	8.82
46	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	3	1.45	11	3	.727	8.0	2.55
Total		85	3	66	69	6	0.81	77	0.91	300	2.28	538	38	.929	386.0	7.42