Players

Will Brady 5 Libero (L)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	16	-	-	17	16

Season 11 Totals
DIGS	RCV RT	RCV PCT	ASSISTS	ACES
198 3rd	2.22 71st	.933 74th	112 69th	24 73rd

Career Honors

S121st All-TMVL1st All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	0	2	0.00	12	.833	7	2.33	9	.778	0.0	5.39
2	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	4	1.000	4	1.33	4	1.000	0.0	6.71
4	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2	2	0.40	19	.895	3	0.60	5	.600	2.0	6.15
5	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	0	0.40	14	1.000	4	0.80	5	.800	2.0	5.15
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	0	1	0.00	12	.917	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	8.45
8	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	9	.778	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	8.65
10	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	5	1.67	6	.833	1.0	4.88
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	8	.875	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	10.00
13	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2	3	0.50	19	.842	2	0.50	3	.667	2.0	6.86
14	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	2	0.00	15	.867	4	0.80	5	.800	0.0	6.10
18	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	0	1	0.00	16	.938	9	1.80	13	.692	0.0	8.09
19	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	4	.500	0.0	4.58
22	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2	0	0.67	12	1.000	3	1.00	3	1.000	2.0	6.25
23	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	2	0	0.50	12	1.000	2	0.50	3	.667	2.0	5.13
25	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	0	0.00	2	.000	0.0	6.40
27	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	0	0.00	8	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	0.0	2.60
29	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	1	0	0.33	18	1.000	4	1.33	8	.500	1.0	6.46
30	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	2	0.33	12	.833	3	1.00	6	.500	1.0	6.78
32	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2	2	0.50	19	.895	9	2.25	11	.818	2.0	5.13
34	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	12	2	3	0.50	22	.864	7	1.75	8	.875	2.0	5.13
35	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1	3	0.25	12	.750	3	0.75	5	.600	1.0	6.05
37	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	2	1	0.50	13	.923	1	0.25	2	.500	2.0	4.50
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	0	0.33	10	1.000	2	0.67	3	.667	1.0	4.65
40	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	3	0	1	0.00	14	.929	9	1.80	9	1.000	0.0	7.32
42	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	4	0.25	12	.667	7	1.75	11	.636	1.0	6.32
44	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	7	1	2	0.20	16	.875	6	1.20	9	.667	1.0	3.98
45	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	3	0.25	16	.813	3	0.75	5	.600	1.0	4.80
47	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	1	0.00	11	.909	2	0.50	5	.400	0.0	3.60
Total		106	.	.	.	.	.	135	24	38	0.23	343	.889	112	1.06	158	.709	24.0	5.93

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	2	1.63	8	1	.875	0.0	5.39
2	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	5	2.21	14	0	1.000	0.0	6.71
4	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	20	2.31	35	3	.914	2.0	6.15
5	Columbia W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	15	1.84	37	4	.892	2.0	5.15
7	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	11	2.59	17	0	1.000	0.0	8.45
8	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	16	5.33	4	2.20	10	0	1.000	0.0	8.65
10	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	3	1.86	14	1	.929	1.0	4.88
11	Ames W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	13	4.33	8	2.80	10	0	1.000	0.0	10.00
13	Dallas W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	17	2.34	29	1	.966	2.0	6.86
14	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.00	17	2.23	30	4	.867	0.0	6.10
18	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	18	2.50	28	1	.964	0.0	8.09
19	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	15	2.40	25	0	1.000	0.0	4.58
22	Pekin W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	9	2.22	18	1	.944	2.0	6.25
23	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	10	2.29	21	1	.952	2.0	5.13
25	Albuquerque L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	16	2.37	27	2	.926	0.0	6.40
27	Columbia W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	1.81	16	2	.875	0.0	2.60
29	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	14	2.13	24	2	.917	1.0	6.46
30	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	12	2.25	24	1	.958	1.0	6.78
32	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	17	2.26	27	3	.889	2.0	5.13
34	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	13	2.19	26	1	.962	2.0	5.13
35	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.50	12	1.96	26	4	.846	1.0	6.05
37	Teutopolis W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	12	2.38	24	0	1.000	2.0	4.50
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	9	2.05	21	2	.905	1.0	4.65
40	Alton W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	16	3.20	17	2.03	35	3	.914	0.0	7.32
42	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	19	2.55	29	0	1.000	1.0	6.32
44	St. Charles W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	17	2.12	33	5	.848	1.0	3.98
45	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	16	2.23	35	2	.943	1.0	4.80
47	Sheboygan W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	13	2.20	30	1	.967	0.0	3.60
Total		106	.	.	.	.	.	198	1.87	346	2.22	673	45	.933	24.0	5.93