Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 18 hours and 10 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Tuesday, April 28th, 2026 - 11:49:09 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Zach Mitchell 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	14	16	8	-

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
87 225th	.188 277th	9 241st	10 404th	48 143rd

Career Honors

S122nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	14	.143	0	0	1	0.00	6	.833	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.41
2	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	5	.200	0	0	1	0.00	4	.750	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.44
3	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	5	13	-.077	5	3	1	1.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.13
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	4	1.00	3	13	.077	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.27
9	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	1	0.33	1	3	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	1.96
10	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	4	1.00	6	16	-.125	7	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.67
11	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	10	.500	4	1	3	0.25	12	.750	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.13
14	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	14	.429	6	1	3	0.20	15	.800	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.77
15	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	9	.444	2	0	2	0.00	8	.750	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.70
17	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	7	2.33	3	14	.286	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.05
18	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	11	.455	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.25
21	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	3	9	.222	3	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.31
22	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	5	.600	2	0	0	0.00	10	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.66
29	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	5	13	.000	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.14
31	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	4	11	-.091	1	1	2	0.33	6	.667	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.97
36	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	1	17	.529	7	3	2	0.75	17	.882	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.91
41	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	6	15	-.133	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.98
Total		58	87	1.50	51	192	.188	41	9	21	0.16	136	.846	.	.	.	.	122.5	5.10

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.41
2	Quincy L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	2.44
3	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.13
8	Portland W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	3.27
9	San Diego W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	1.96
10	Arlington L (1–3 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	2	0.50	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	5.67
11	Quincy W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.13
14	Dallas L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	4.77
15	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.0	3.70
17	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	2	2	4	0	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	7.05
18	Schenectady L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	4.25
21	Antioch W (3–0 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	6.31
22	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.66
29	Columbia W (3–1 sets)	4	1	6	7	0	1.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	6.14
31	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6.5	5.97
36	Tucson W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.91
41	Baton Rouge L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	1	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	5.98
Total		58	5	43	48	4	0.83	10	0.17	.	.	.	.	.	122.5	5.10