Players

Tyger Coogan 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
11	12	13	13	10	6

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	7	34	.382	8	1	6	0.20	20	.700	.	.	.	.	21.5	7.14
3	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	3	23	.304	6	2	5	0.40	17	.706	.	.	.	.	16.0	5.52
11	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	2	13	.538	1	0	1	0.00	9	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	9.0	2.68
13	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	13	.385	1	0	4	0.00	9	.556	1	0.25	1	1.000	7.0	3.68
21	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	16	4.00	6	29	.345	7	0	2	0.00	15	.867	0	0.00	1	.000	18.5	8.91
22	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	11	.455	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	1	0.25	1	1.000	7.5	2.96
25	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	25	5.00	9	38	.421	3	0	3	0.00	16	.813	.	.	.	.	27.0	7.94
29	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	11	25	.000	12	5	0	1.00	23	1.000	.	.	.	.	17.5	5.69
34	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	14	.357	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.58
35	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	4	12	.083	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	0	0.00	1	.000	6.0	3.32
39	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	9	22	-.091	2	0	1	0.00	12	.917	0	0.00	2	.000	10.0	3.29
42	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	10	2.00	6	24	.167	1	0	4	0.00	10	.600	.	.	.	.	12.0	3.33
44	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	11	3.67	1	15	.667	2	0	3	0.00	8	.625	.	.	.	.	12.0	6.92
45	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	3	14	.429	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	9.5	3.52
Total		59	154	2.61	67	287	.303	51	8	33	0.14	175	.811	2	0.03	7	.286	182.0	4.96

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	10	2.00	13	1.95	40	3	.925	21.5	7.14
3	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	8	8	0	1.60	5	1.00	15	2.42	24	1	.958	16.0	5.52
11	Cincinnati L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.25	14	1.77	35	6	.829	9.0	2.68
13	Alton W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	3	0.50	3	0.75	14	2.33	24	2	.917	7.0	3.68
21	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	1	3	4	0	1.00	4	1.00	16	2.57	23	0	1.000	18.5	8.91
22	St. Charles W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	1	0.25	10	2.14	28	1	.964	7.5	2.96
25	Antioch W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	11	2.20	16	2.06	35	3	.914	27.0	7.94
29	Spokane W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	10	2.00	21	2.17	35	3	.914	17.5	5.69
34	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	10	2.04	23	4	.826	8.5	4.58
35	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	17	2.20	35	4	.886	6.0	3.32
39	Manitowoc L (2–3 sets)	5	1	4	5	0	1.00	3	0.60	15	2.00	34	3	.912	10.0	3.29
42	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	1	0.60	4	0.80	19	2.02	41	4	.902	12.0	3.33
44	Mendon W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	9	2.38	16	1	.938	12.0	6.92
45	Nashville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	2	0.50	12	1.87	30	6	.800	9.5	3.52
Total		59	4	32	36	4	0.61	56	0.95	201	2.10	423	41	.903	182.0	4.96