Players

Lucas Abraham 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	14	13	14	12	9

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	4	17	.235	7	0	2	0.00	15	.867	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.92
4	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	9	28	.107	4	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	1	0.33	1	1.000	12.5	6.50
8	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	9	26	.000	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	10.0	4.99
10	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	1	11	.273	0	0	2	0.00	7	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	4.5	3.21
12	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	11	2.20	3	17	.471	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	.	.	.	.	11.5	4.60
15	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	6	31	.452	8	1	3	0.20	21	.857	.	.	.	.	21.0	6.62
17	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	9	.667	1	0	1	0.00	5	.800	.	.	.	.	7.5	4.44
19	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	5	21	.190	7	2	1	0.50	14	.929	1	0.25	1	1.000	13.0	6.15
21	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	9	19	-.053	0	0	4	0.00	7	.429	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.08
22	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	19	6.33	4	31	.484	4	1	4	0.33	11	.636	0	0.00	1	.000	22.0	7.95
25	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	3	9	.000	9	3	1	1.00	17	.941	.	.	.	.	6.5	3.80
30	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	5	23	.217	14	2	2	0.50	24	.917	.	.	.	.	13.0	5.52
39	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	19	3.80	7	36	.333	7	2	1	0.40	17	.941	0	0.00	2	.000	26.5	8.52
40	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	12	4.00	3	20	.450	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.89
45	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	19	4.75	5	29	.483	5	1	3	0.25	16	.813	.	.	.	.	21.0	6.63
Total		54	169	3.13	73	327	.294	77	13	28	0.24	199	.859	2	0.04	6	.333	202.0	5.92

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	1	5	6	1	2.00	3	1.00	12	2.71	14	0	1.000	11.5	7.92
4	Carlsbad L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	3	1.00	11	1.88	25	3	.880	12.5	6.50
8	Denali L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	.	.	10	1.92	25	2	.920	10.0	4.99
10	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	14	2.25	24	2	.917	4.5	3.21
12	Starkville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	1	1	0	0.20	3	0.60	21	2.29	42	2	.952	11.5	4.60
15	New Orleans W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	17	1.95	39	4	.897	21.0	6.62
17	Quincy W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	10	3.33	9	2.12	17	2	.882	7.5	4.44
19	Carlsbad W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	3	0.75	21	2.45	31	2	.935	13.0	6.15
21	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	11	1.87	23	5	.783	8.5	4.08
22	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	3	1.00	9	1.91	23	2	.913	22.0	7.95
25	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	13	2.00	22	5	.773	6.5	3.80
30	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	7	1.75	13	1.83	30	3	.900	13.0	5.52
39	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	3	5	8	0	1.60	5	1.00	16	2.37	27	1	.963	26.5	8.52
40	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	13	2.59	17	1	.941	13.0	7.89
45	Mat-Su L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	5	1.25	4	1.73	15	2	.867	21.0	6.63
Total		54	5	30	35	5	0.65	55	1.02	194	2.11	374	36	.904	202.0	5.92