Players

Owen Haynes 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	17	14	8	-

Season 11 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
192 99th	.394 131st	20 105th	20 356th	82 23rd

Career Honors

S122nd All-BIG-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	2	10	.300	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.39
3	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	2	16	.375	5	1	1	0.20	12	.917	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.98
5	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	3	12	.417	0	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.68
6	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	9	2.25	0	13	.692	7	1	2	0.25	15	.867	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.36
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	6	1.20	2	9	.444	2	0	4	0.00	12	.667	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.54
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	2	18	.389	11	1	1	0.20	20	.950	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.62
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	14	.500	2	1	2	0.33	8	.750	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.97
12	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	2	16	.563	3	1	3	0.25	13	.769	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.29
15	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	6	19	.053	2	1	3	0.20	13	.769	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.19
16	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	6	1.20	4	13	.154	4	1	3	0.20	12	.750	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.85
18	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	9	2.25	4	15	.333	6	0	2	0.00	13	.846	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.62
19	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	3	18	.389	5	1	1	0.25	13	.923	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.68
22	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	9	1.80	4	16	.313	3	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.11
23	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	2	12	.500	2	0	1	0.00	9	.889	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.11
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	1	11	.455	3	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.13
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	2	12	.417	3	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.31
30	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	2	14	.429	2	2	0	0.67	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.32
33	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	6	.333	7	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.53
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	2	11	.455	1	1	2	0.25	10	.800	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.97
38	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	11	2.20	0	14	.786	11	3	2	0.60	20	.900	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.36
40	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	1	9	.667	3	0	0	0.00	7	1.000	.	.	.	.	10.0	9.03
43	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	4	13	.154	4	0	0	0.00	12	1.000	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.22
44	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	6	12	-.167	0	0	0	0.00	6	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.10
45	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	9	.333	6	2	4	0.50	14	.714	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.75
48	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	2	15	.667	10	2	1	0.50	17	.941	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.30
Total		98	192	1.96	63	327	.394	105	20	41	0.20	292	.860	.	.	.	.	256.5	5.94

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 11)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.39
3	Sheboygan W (3–2 sets)	5	2	8	10	2	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	15.0	7.98
5	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	6.68
6	Antioch L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	1	0.50	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	6.36
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	2	0.40	.	.	.	.	.	8.0	4.54
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.0	5.62
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	5.97
12	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	6.29
15	Burlington L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	0	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.19
16	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.85
18	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.62
19	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	13.0	7.68
22	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	0	10	10	0	2.00	1	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	14.0	8.11
23	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	5.11
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.13
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	5.31
30	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	1	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	6.32
33	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	5.53
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.97
38	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	15.5	6.36
40	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10.0	9.03
43	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	2	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.22
44	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	4.10
45	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	1	2	3	1	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.75
48	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	0	1	1	1	0.25	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	14.5	6.30
Total		98	7	75	82	10	0.84	20	0.20	.	.	.	.	.	256.5	5.94