Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	2	.000	2	1	2	0.33	10	.800	17	5.67	63	.270	1.0	1.68
4	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	4	.250	3	0	2	0.00	11	.818	17	5.67	51	.333	1.0	2.38
7	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	0	3	.333	5	1	5	0.33	13	.615	29	9.67	78	.372	3.0	5.47
10	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	10	.100	3	1	1	0.25	13	.923	30	7.50	84	.357	3.5	3.56
14	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	1	0.25	1	4	.000	7	2	6	0.50	18	.667	47	11.75	92	.511	4.5	7.97
15	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	3	0.75	0	7	.429	9	2	1	0.50	21	.952	38	9.50	75	.507	7.0	7.18
18	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	2	9	-.222	2	1	1	0.33	9	.889	26	8.67	56	.464	2.0	4.27
21	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	2	0.50	1	5	.200	8	2	4	0.50	20	.800	46	11.50	90	.511	4.0	6.58
26	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	3	.000	2	1	2	0.33	9	.778	29	9.67	67	.433	1.5	4.02
29	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	1	0.20	0	3	.333	8	1	1	0.20	21	.952	44	8.80	88	.500	3.0	5.00
34	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	3	.667	5	0	2	0.00	14	.857	38	12.67	69	.551	2.0	8.12
39	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	1	6	.167	3	1	1	0.33	12	.917	37	12.33	69	.536	3.0	6.86
40	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	5	.400	3	0	0	0.00	11	1.000	35	11.67	65	.538	2.5	6.84
44	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	0.00	0	4	.000	3	1	2	0.33	11	.818	45	15.00	70	.643	3.5	9.33
45	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	2	0.67	0	6	.333	4	0	1	0.00	13	.923	33	11.00	63	.524	2.0	5.28
Total		51	19	0.37	6	74	.176	67	14	31	0.27	206	.850	511	10.02	1080	.473	43.5	5.64

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
2	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	1.68
4	Sheboygan L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.0	2.38
7	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	1	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.47
10	Schenectady L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	3	0.75	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	3.56
14	Manitowoc W (3–1 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	13	3.25	.	.	.	.	.	4.5	7.97
15	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	1	1.00	9	2.25	.	.	.	.	.	7.0	7.18
18	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	4.27
21	Albuquerque L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	6.58
26	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	1.5	4.02
29	Alton L (2–3 sets)	5	0	2	2	0	0.40	8	1.60	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	5.00
34	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	8.12
39	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3.0	6.86
40	Antioch L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	1	0.33	3	1.00	.	.	.	.	.	2.5	6.84
44	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	0	5	5	0	1.67	4	1.33	.	.	.	.	.	3.5	9.33
45	Teutopolis L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	2.0	5.28
Total		51	0	21	21	4	0.41	62	1.22	.	.	.	.	.	43.5	5.64