Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0	0	0.00	9	1.000	4	1.33	10	.400	0.0	3.35
5	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	2	0.20	14	.857	3	0.60	6	.500	1.0	6.18
9	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	4	0	2	0.00	10	.800	4	1.33	5	.800	0.0	5.98
12	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	1	2	0.33	8	.750	1	0.33	4	.250	1.0	2.05
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0	1	0.00	8	.875	2	0.67	5	.400	0.0	3.55
18	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	3	0.25	15	.800	2	0.50	8	.250	1.0	5.08
21	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.33	15	.933	6	2.00	8	.750	1.0	5.96
25	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1	1	0.25	17	.941	0	0.00	6	.000	1.0	3.15
32	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	1	0.33	9	.889	3	1.00	5	.600	1.0	3.75
34	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	1	0	0.33	8	1.000	.	.	.	.	1.0	4.30
Total		34	.	.	.	.	.	34	7	13	0.21	113	.885	25	0.74	57	.439	7.0	4.34

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Carlsbad W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	5	1.75	20	3	.850	0.0	3.35
5	Denali W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	14	2.80	23	2.15	46	4	.913	1.0	6.18
9	Arlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	12	2.03	31	3	.903	0.0	5.98
12	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	6	1.88	16	2	.875	1.0	2.05
15	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	13	2.23	26	0	1.000	0.0	3.55
18	Kentucky L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	13	1.97	30	3	.900	1.0	5.08
21	Spokane L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	13	2.20	25	1	.960	1.0	5.96
25	Ames L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	10	1.79	34	3	.912	1.0	3.15
32	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	13	2.29	21	2	.905	1.0	3.75
34	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	7	2.33	6	1.83	23	1	.957	1.0	4.30
Total		34	.	.	.	.	.	64	1.88	114	2.02	272	22	.919	7.0	4.34