Players

Parker Lewis 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
16	16	15	15	15	9

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	5	1.67	9	20	-.200	4	1	2	0.33	9	.778	.	.	.	.	6.0	2.18
3	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	2	15	.133	2	0	3	0.00	9	.667	1	0.33	1	1.000	4.0	4.03
4	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	7	27	.037	1	1	2	0.33	7	.714	.	.	.	.	9.5	4.20
5	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0.33	5	9	-.444	2	1	0	0.33	9	1.000	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.38
8	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	10	2.00	7	25	.120	3	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	11.5	3.07
9	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	5	1.67	5	13	.000	7	1	2	0.33	13	.846	0	0.00	1	.000	7.0	4.78
11	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	11	3.67	2	26	.346	1	1	1	0.33	10	.900	0	0.00	2	.000	12.0	5.32
13	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	1	20	.300	6	0	4	0.00	15	.733	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.89
15	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	7	1.75	5	13	.154	6	0	3	0.00	15	.800	1	0.25	1	1.000	8.5	4.13
17	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	0	14	.429	9	1	1	0.33	15	.933	.	.	.	.	10.0	5.12
18	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	6	1.50	1	20	.250	3	0	1	0.00	14	.929	1	0.25	1	1.000	6.5	2.79
21	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	5	1.25	3	23	.087	4	0	1	0.00	12	.917	.	.	.	.	7.0	4.15
25	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	6	1.50	2	15	.267	6	0	3	0.00	18	.833	.	.	.	.	9.0	4.16
26	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	7	1.75	4	18	.167	3	1	0	0.25	14	1.000	.	.	.	.	9.0	2.53
29	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	8	2.67	1	13	.538	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	1	0.33	2	.500	8.0	4.71
30	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	0	16	.500	4	1	3	0.25	14	.786	.	.	.	.	9.0	3.10
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	6	2.00	5	19	.053	4	2	2	0.67	12	.833	.	.	.	.	8.5	4.21
44	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	12	3.00	1	20	.550	10	1	0	0.25	18	1.000	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.17
Total		65	122	1.88	60	326	.190	77	11	31	0.17	224	.862	4	0.06	8	.500	153.5	4.05

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	1.78	27	5	.815	6.0	2.18
3	Alton L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	13	2.32	22	3	.864	4.0	4.03
4	St. Charles L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	5	1.67	5	1.60	25	4	.840	9.5	4.20
5	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	.	.	19	2.43	30	2	.933	5.0	4.38
8	Quincy L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	3	0.60	13	1.89	37	5	.865	11.5	3.07
9	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	5	1.67	8	2.19	16	1	.938	7.0	4.78
11	Portland L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	10	2.05	22	1	.955	12.0	5.32
13	St. Charles L (2–3 sets)	5	1	2	3	0	0.60	5	1.00	25	2.13	46	6	.870	9.0	3.89
15	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	1	0.75	4	1.00	19	2.11	36	6	.833	8.5	4.13
17	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	6	6	0	2.00	1	0.33	10	2.11	27	1	.963	10.0	5.12
18	Spokane L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	4	1.00	13	1.97	35	2	.943	6.5	2.79
21	Kentucky W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	3	0.75	17	2.16	32	4	.875	7.0	4.15
25	Mat-Su W (3–1 sets)	4	1	4	5	0	1.25	12	3.00	12	1.90	31	3	.903	9.0	4.16
26	New Orleans W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	4	1.00	8	1.74	23	4	.826	9.0	2.53
29	Pekin L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	15	2.10	29	2	.931	8.0	4.71
30	Mendon L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	11	2.00	24	2	.917	9.0	3.10
39	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	12	2.26	23	2	.913	8.5	4.21
44	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	0	2	2	0	0.50	3	0.75	14	2.03	30	5	.833	14.0	6.17
Total		65	2	37	39	3	0.60	64	0.98	235	2.04	515	58	.887	153.5	4.05