Players

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	5	.600	0.0	9.01
5	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.33	11	.909	3	1.00	12	.250	1.0	5.78
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	5	.600	0.0	4.40
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.60	8	.375	0.0	5.75
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	7	.714	0.0	6.66
12	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	7	.714	0.0	5.90
13	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	12	.417	0.0	7.93
16	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	10	.800	0.0	7.54
18	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	9	.778	0.0	3.74
19	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	10	.800	0.0	5.11
22	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.20	7	.857	0.0	6.58
23	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	3	.667	0.0	3.45
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	2	1.000	0.0	5.30
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	5	.200	0.0	6.78
30	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	3.60
33	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	6	.667	0.0	6.61
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.50	2	1.000	0.0	5.70
38	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	0.80	8	.500	0.0	7.94
40	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.33	8	.500	0.0	5.48
43	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	0.75	6	.500	0.0	5.35
44	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	3	1.00	3	1.000	0.0	3.15
45	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	7	.571	0.0	4.95
48	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	7	.714	0.0	6.80
Total		88	.	.	.	.	.	5	1	1	0.01	11	.909	93	1.06	152	.612	1.0	5.80

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
1	Arlington W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	11	2.69	13	0	1.000	0.0	9.01
5	Dallas L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	6	2.00	3	2.00	10	0	1.000	1.0	5.78
7	Pekin W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.00	18	2.31	32	2	.938	0.0	4.40
9	Tucson W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	9	1.80	22	2.28	36	3	.917	0.0	5.75
11	St. Charles W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.67	9	2.25	16	2	.875	0.0	6.66
12	Schenectady W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	8	2.00	12	2.12	25	1	.960	0.0	5.90
13	Ames W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.75	11	2.44	18	1	.944	0.0	7.93
16	Baton Rouge L (2–3 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	20	2.47	30	1	.967	0.0	7.54
18	Cincinnati W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	8	1.94	18	3	.833	0.0	3.74
19	Arlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	7	1.75	10	2.00	25	3	.880	0.0	5.11
22	Schenectady W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	8	1.60	25	2.40	40	2	.950	0.0	6.58
23	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	4	1.00	18	2.05	39	5	.872	0.0	3.45
25	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	12	2.17	24	1	.958	0.0	5.30
26	Baton Rouge W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	9	3.00	12	2.21	19	2	.895	0.0	6.78
30	Mat-Su L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	1	0.33	7	2.11	19	0	1.000	0.0	3.60
33	Manitowoc W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	11	3.67	5	1.81	21	3	.857	0.0	6.61
34	Portland L (1–3 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	11	2.21	24	1	.958	0.0	5.70
38	Ames W (3–2 sets)	5	.	.	.	.	.	11	2.20	27	2.58	38	1	.974	0.0	7.94
40	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.67	9	2.17	18	1	.944	0.0	5.48
43	Spokane W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	5	1.25	15	2.37	27	1	.963	0.0	5.35
44	Columbia L (0–3 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	11	2.00	22	2	.909	0.0	3.15
45	Burlington W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	6	1.50	12	2.20	25	1	.960	0.0	4.95
48	Antioch W (3–1 sets)	4	.	.	.	.	.	9	2.25	18	2.36	28	3	.893	0.0	6.80
Total		88	.	.	.	.	.	163	1.85	306	2.24	567	39	.931	1.0	5.80