Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 3 hours and 57 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 02:02:16 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Chase Capwell 5 Middle Blocker (MB)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
15	-	17	16	12	-

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
66 256th	.210 265th	3 370th	6 432nd	46 158th

Career Honors

S112nd All-PAC-8

S121st All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	2	7	.143	1	0	1	0.00	7	.857	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.70
5	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	0	18	.500	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.59
7	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	2	16	.438	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.15
9	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	5	1.25	2	12	.250	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.18
10	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	8	1.60	3	17	.294	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.24
11	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	7	1.40	4	13	.231	2	0	2	0.00	10	.800	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.79
14	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	6	2.00	2	10	.400	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.02
15	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	4	0.80	6	17	-.118	7	1	2	0.20	16	.875	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.69
17	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	3	0.75	5	16	-.125	3	1	2	0.25	14	.857	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.55
18	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	8	2.00	4	18	.222	7	1	1	0.25	16	.938	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.74
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	13	.077	2	0	1	0.00	8	.875	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.61
Total		46	66	1.43	33	157	.210	22	3	9	0.07	71	.873	.	.	.	.	96.0	5.11

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	2	2	0	0.67	1	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	4.0	3.70
5	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	7	7	1	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.59
7	Carlsbad L (2–3 sets)	5	0	4	4	0	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.0	5.15
9	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.5	2.18
10	San Jose W (3–2 sets)	5	2	5	7	0	1.40	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	12.5	6.24
11	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	1	0.60	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.79
14	Santa Clara W (3–0 sets)	3	1	1	2	0	0.67	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	7.5	5.02
15	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	3	3	6	2	1.20	4	0.80	.	.	.	.	.	9.5	5.69
17	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	1	7	8	1	2.00	1	0.25	.	.	.	.	.	8.5	6.55
18	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	5	5	1	1.25	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	11.5	7.74
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	1	0	1	0	0.33	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	5.0	3.61
Total		46	8	38	46	6	1.00	6	0.13	.	.	.	.	.	96.0	5.11