Players

Session 13 Coaches Poll deadline in 5 hours and 42 minutes

MSWL UNITED MSWL U2 TMVL
Wednesday, April 29th, 2026 - 12:17:04 PM (gmt)

TMVL Season 17 // Landing

Logo

Donate ELO Ranking Honor Roll NET Ranking Stats Leaders Teams Of The Week Wall

If you'd like to join please click this link and add your name to the waitlist.

PAC 8 Conference

SEC Conference

BIG 8 Conference

Big East Conference

Cameron Dalton 5 Outside Hitter (OH)
Player Skills
SERVING	RECEIVING	BLOCKING	ATTACKING	DEFENSE	SETTING
13	17	15	16	15	10

Season 9 Totals
KILLS	ATK PCT	ACES	DIGS	BLOCKS
156 137th	.148 303rd	12 204th	70 155th	50 130th

Career Honors

S112nd All-PAC-8

S121st All-PAC-8

Match Statistics - OFFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Attack					Serve						Set
m	opponent/sets	sp	k	k/s	e	ta	pct	pts	sa	se	sa/s	ta	pct	a	a/s	ta	pct	pts	rating
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	10	28	-.036	3	0	2	0.00	9	.778	.	.	.	.	10.5	6.63
5	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	1	14	.571	4	3	2	0.60	13	.846	.	.	.	.	15.0	4.73
8	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	10	3.33	3	18	.389	8	1	2	0.33	14	.857	1	0.33	1	1.000	11.5	7.81
9	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	8	2.00	12	35	-.114	4	0	2	0.00	12	.833	.	.	.	.	8.5	3.14
11	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	9	1.80	3	22	.273	1	1	2	0.20	10	.800	1	0.20	3	.333	12.5	4.20
12	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	11	2.75	5	31	.194	3	1	3	0.25	10	.700	.	.	.	.	16.0	6.30
13	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	7	2.33	5	16	.125	7	0	3	0.00	13	.769	.	.	.	.	7.0	5.24
15	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	20	4.00	10	51	.196	5	0	4	0.00	14	.714	0	0.00	1	.000	21.5	8.64
17	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	15	3.75	5	34	.294	3	0	1	0.00	10	.900	.	.	.	.	16.5	7.70
18	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	10	2.50	9	31	.032	5	2	1	0.50	11	.909	.	.	.	.	14.0	6.44
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	9	3.00	7	26	.077	6	0	1	0.00	11	.909	.	.	.	.	9.5	6.82
25	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	20	4.00	5	35	.429	8	1	3	0.20	18	.833	.	.	.	.	23.0	8.95
26	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	3	16	.063	5	1	1	0.33	12	.917	1	0.33	1	1.000	5.5	3.97
31	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	8	2.67	11	29	-.103	9	1	2	0.33	15	.867	.	.	.	.	11.0	7.04
36	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	4	1.33	6	17	-.118	4	1	1	0.33	11	.909	0	0.00	1	.000	6.5	4.16
41	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	3	1.00	0	9	.333	3	0	3	0.00	9	.667	.	.	.	.	5.0	4.01
Total		60	156	2.60	95	412	.148	78	12	33	0.20	192	.828	3	0.05	7	.429	193.5	5.99

Match Statistics - DEFENSE (Season 9)

Match		Sets	Block					Dig		Receive
m	opponent/sets	sp	s	a	t	be	blk/s	d	d/s	3	rt	rcv	e	pct	pts	rating
4	Tucson L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	4	1.33	11	2.13	24	3	.875	10.5	6.63
5	Mat-Su L (2–3 sets)	5	0	6	6	1	1.20	5	1.00	14	2.25	28	1	.964	15.0	4.73
8	Albuquerque W (3–0 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	7	2.33	7	2.31	13	0	1.000	11.5	7.81
9	Quincy L (1–3 sets)	4	0	1	1	0	0.25	7	1.75	9	1.74	31	3	.903	8.5	3.14
11	San Diego L (2–3 sets)	5	0	5	5	0	1.00	3	0.60	11	2.25	24	0	1.000	12.5	4.20
12	Starkville W (3–1 sets)	4	0	8	8	0	2.00	5	1.25	11	2.13	24	1	.958	16.0	6.30
13	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	.	.	.	.	.	2	0.67	10	2.33	21	1	.952	7.0	5.24
15	Nashville L (2–3 sets)	5	0	3	3	0	0.60	10	2.00	14	2.48	25	0	1.000	21.5	8.64
17	Columbia L (1–3 sets)	4	0	3	3	0	0.75	1	0.25	15	2.60	20	0	1.000	16.5	7.70
18	Baton Rouge W (3–1 sets)	4	0	4	4	0	1.00	7	1.75	16	2.23	30	2	.933	14.0	6.44
21	Cincinnati L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	1	0.33	11	2.42	19	1	.947	9.5	6.82
25	Quincy W (3–2 sets)	5	0	4	4	1	0.80	7	1.40	14	2.55	20	0	1.000	23.0	8.95
26	Burlington L (0–3 sets)	3	0	1	1	0	0.33	2	0.67	6	2.20	15	1	.933	5.5	3.97
31	Tucson W (3–0 sets)	3	0	4	4	0	1.33	5	1.67	6	2.08	12	2	.833	11.0	7.04
36	New Orleans L (0–3 sets)	3	0	3	3	0	1.00	1	0.33	7	2.18	17	2	.882	6.5	4.16
41	San Jose L (0–3 sets)	3	1	2	3	0	1.00	3	1.00	7	2.13	16	2	.875	5.0	4.01
Total		60	1	49	50	2	0.83	70	1.17	169	2.24	339	19	.944	193.5	5.99